"Go find something from that doc and refute it with actual historical evidence."

something

it

Both words singular. One thing. It should be easy according to your logic saying it is all bunk so click anywhere in it, choose that random fact being discussed at the time, and refute it with historical evidence. It's really not hard. lmao

You won't because you can't.

No more shekels for you.

u/Cyber1776 - in response to your reply below: I told you no more shekels for you. To answer your questions though: the burden of proof is on you. You're calling bullshit so it is up to you to prove the bullshit that you claim. It's not up to me. Keep your bad-faith arguments away from here. Like I said: No. More. Shekels. For. You. L. M. A. O.

edit #2 - u/Cyber1776 lmao L

"Go find something from that doc and refute it with actual historical evidence."

something

it

Both words singular. One thing. It should be easy according to your logic saying it is all bunk so click anywhere in it, choose that random fact being discussed at the time, and refute it with historical evidence. It's really not hard. lmao

You won't because you can't.

No more shekels for you.

u/Cyber1776 - in response to your reply below: I told you no more shekels for you. To answer your questions though: the burden of proof is on you. You're calling bullshit so it is up to you to prove the bullshit that you claim. It's not up to me. Keep your bad-faith arguments away from here. Like I said: No. More. Shekels. For. You. L. M. A. O.

"Go find something from that doc and refute it with actual historical evidence."

something

it

Both words singular. One thing. It should be easy according to your logic saying it is all bunk so click anywhere in it, choose that random fact being discussed at the time, and refute it with historical evidence. It's really not hard. lmao

You won't because you can't.

No more shekels for you.