YOU ARE COMPARING ONE DEPTH PERCEPTION TO A SECOND EXAMPLE OF DEPTH PERCEPION
There is only the one - actual depth perception. It comes from having two vantage points a known distance apart from one another and comparing the different images. The brain has tricks to approximate such things when that data is not available - the way we can “see/perceive” three dimensions when looking at a two dimensional image, or blocking one eye - but this isn’t real depth perception - it’s an estimation based on light/shadow and other things.
aS TO WHY THERE IS NO NOTIBLE PARRALAX IN THE STARS IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO PERCIEVABLE DEPTH
Stars (of which planets are one type - the “wandering” kind) DO have noticeable parallax which is how determinations of their depth are calculated. The planets have parallax from two observers spread out on the world, and stars have parallax over the course of the year.
In any case, this is all moot because we are in agreement. When looking at a star or planet with your eyes you do not perceive depth (because they are too far away, and our eyes are too close together).
YOU ARE COMPARING ONE DEPTH PERCEPTION TO A SECOND EXAMPLE OF DEPTH PERCEPION
There is only the one - actual depth perception. It comes from having two vantage points a known distance apart from one another and comparing the different images. The brain has tricks to approximate such things when that data is not available - the way we can “see/perceive” three dimensions when looking at a two dimensional image, or blocking one eye - but this isn’t real depth perception - it’s an estimation based on light/shadow and other things.
aS TO WHY THERE IS NO NOTIBLE PARRALAX IN THE STARS IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO PERCIEVABLE DEPTH
Stars (of which planets are one type - the “wandering” kind) DO have noticeable parallax which is how determinations of their depth are calculated. The planets have parallax from two observers spread out on the world, and stars have parallax over the course of the year.
In any case, this is all moot because we are in agreement. When looking at a star of planet with your eyes you do not perceive depth (because they are too far away, and our eyes are too close together).
YOU ARE COMPARING ONE DEPTH PERCEPTION TO A SECOND EXAMPLE OF DEPTH PERCEPION
There is only the one - actual depth perception. It comes from having two vantage points a known distance apart from one another and comparing the different images. The brain has tricks to approximate such things when that data is not available - the way we can “see/perceive” three dimensions when looking at a two dimensional image, or blocking one eye - but this isn’t real depth perception - it’s an estimation based on light/shadow and other things.
aS TO WHY THERE IS NO NOTIBLE PARRALAX IN THE STARS IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE NO PERCIEVABLE DEPTH
Stars (of which planets are one type - the “wandering” kind) DO have noticeable parallax which is how determinations of there depth are calculated. The planets have parallax from two observers spread out on the world, and stars have parallax over the course of the year.
In any case, this is all moot because we are in agreement. When looking at a star of planet with your eyes you do not perceive depth (because they are too far away, and our eyes are too close together).