Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You don't have enough information to know if the parents and midwife were wrong. The article doesn't state the intended treatment method. Only that the doctor demanded the baby be taken to the ER.

You know that urgent care is required by most insurance. By that thought, the baby could have gotten the correct care needed without going to the ER. ( Rx from a different source then demanded) And, be monitored by the midwife rather than the doctor / hospital.

The paperwork error proves they knew they were wrong. They filed the paperwork with the wrong name to flag the file. Prompting the instant removal of the baby. This was bullying. Not allowing a second opinion.

Also you can play this game in reverse to get faster treatment in the ER. Simply check in and tell them that you just got back from traveling to an African country that has an active outbreak of certain diseases.

Edit :

They filed the paperwork using the father as, "alleged father". Meaning this baby was taken away with intentional incorrect paperwork. Now getting the baby back is intentionally difficult.

The Jacksons discovered, on reading the paperwork, that the mother was listed as another woman, who had a criminal history.

Rodney Jackson was described as the ‘alleged father’.

https://finnoexpert.com/2023/04/08/social-workers-remove-texas-newborn-after-parents-said-theyd-use-midwife-to-treat-her-jaundice/

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You don't have enough information to know if the parents and midwife were wrong. The article doesn't state the intended treatment method. Only that the doctor demanded the baby be taken to the ER.

You know that urgent care is required by most insurance. By that thought, the baby could have gotten the correct care needed without going to the ER. ( Rx from a different source then demanded) And, be monitored by the midwife rather than the doctor / hospital.

The paperwork error proves they knew they were wrong. They filed the paperwork with the wrong name to flag the file. Prompting the instant removal of the baby. This was bullying. Not allowing a second opinion.

Also you can play this game in reverse to get faster treatment in the ER. Simply check in and tell them that you just got back from traveling to an African country that has an active outbreak of certain diseases.

Edit :

They filed the paperwork using the father as, "alleged father". Meaning this baby was taken away with intentional incorrect paperwork. Now getting the baby back is intentionally difficult.

https://finnoexpert.com/2023/04/08/social-workers-remove-texas-newborn-after-parents-said-theyd-use-midwife-to-treat-her-jaundice/

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You don't have enough information to know if the parents and midwife were wrong. The article doesn't state the intended treatment method. Only that the doctor demanded the baby be taken to the ER.

You know that urgent care is required by most insurance. By that thought, the baby could have gotten the correct care needed without going to the ER. ( Rx from a different source then demanded) And, be monitored by the midwife rather than the doctor / hospital.

The paperwork error proves they knew they were wrong. They filed the paperwork with the wrong name to flag the file. Prompting the instant removal of the baby. This was bullying. Not allowing a second opinion.

Also you can play this game in reverse to get faster treatment in the ER. Simply check in and tell them that you just got back from traveling to an African country that has an active outbreak of certain diseases.

Edit :

They file the paperwork using the father as, "alleged father". Meaning this baby was taken away with intentional incorrect paperwork. Now getting the baby back is intentionally difficult.

https://finnoexpert.com/2023/04/08/social-workers-remove-texas-newborn-after-parents-said-theyd-use-midwife-to-treat-her-jaundice/

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You don't have enough information to know if the parents and midwife were wrong. The article doesn't state the intended treatment method. Only that the doctor demanded the baby be taken to the ER.

You know that urgent care is required by most insurance. By that thought, the baby could have gotten the correct care needed without going to the ER. ( Rx from a different source then demanded) And, be monitored by the midwife rather than the doctor / hospital.

The paperwork error proves they knew they were wrong. They filed the paperwork with the wrong name to flag the file. Prompting the instant removal of the baby. This was bullying. Not allowing a second opinion.

Also you can play this game in reverse to get faster treatment in the ER. Simply check in and tell them that you just got back from traveling to an African country that has an active outbreak of certain diseases.

1 year ago
1 score