Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

At what monkey point. Because you're chatting shit. Didn't you understand the poison gases in the shells fired by the artillery overruning the trenches. The allies in particular the British fired the most chemical weapons in WW1.

Nothing won WW1 apart from surrender and truce. It might've lasted years longer.

You never answered which Baltic State and which starfort? You presumed it was a static defense. What's a trench and trench line? Pretty static. They're a fortified line. They halted supposed mechanisation. Tanks stuck in mud. Trucks no roads to a trench line, and not the same capacity. Where they sooner laid railroads to the front.

Suddenly look it starts agreeing. Artillery. It was the only real weapon. BiPlanes, no accuracy, hand dropped bombs, tanks problematic and breaking, guns not the same range as artillery, or were automatic outside of static machinegun turrets.

More men at it. Yes indeed. Against an artillery causing a larger no man's land.

Can you tell me of a particular hill that only lost because it surrendered. Its artillery was impossible to get close too?

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

At what monkey point. Because you're chatting shit. Didn't you understand the poison gases in the shells fired by the artillery overruning the trenches. The allies in particular the British fired the most chemical weapons in WW1.

Nothing won WW1 apart from surrender and truce. It might've lasted years longer.

You never answered which Baltic State and which starfort? You presumed it was a static defense. What's a trench and trench line? Pretty static. They're a fortified line. They halted supposed mechanisation. Tanks stuck in mud. Trucks no roads to a trench line. Where they sooner laid railroads to the front.

Suddenly look it starts agreeing. Artillery. It was the only real weapon. BiPlanes, no accuracy, hand dropped bombs, tanks problematic and breaking, guns not the same range as artillery, or were automatic outside of static machinegun turrets.

More men at it. Yes indeed. Against an artillery causing a larger no man's land.

Can you tell me of a particular hill that only lost because it surrendered. Its artillery was impossible to get close too?

1 year ago
1 score