Yes my point it is indeed reminiscent. Territory and territory held. Russia is indeed defending acquisitions. While also funnelling an enemy into choke points and surrounding any gains.

Except despite of this, a lot of protocols seem to be missing. Some of it is due to capturing objectives instead of forcing victory. Some are due to the enemy and its support faced.

But generally an opposing power structure is targeted completely degrading its capacity to command. As services and infrastructure of every description is cut off disrupting any ability to counter and command. Further flight plays as big a role as any ground warfare, completely pummelling an enemy into positions overrun by the ground.

Instead there are much bigger fortified lines, trenches, any enemy command centers haven't really been targeted until captured, and then commanded, many services remain partially or intact. The enemy is constantly being resupplied. As any frontline edges forwards.

It seems to be stalling. Compared to otherwise modern war. There are politics involved. Yes. There is a risk of escalation. The country is enormous. It has huge conscription. But said.

Ukraine's main buildings still linger large. Its services are still largely operational. I know this I was playing computer games with people in Kharkiv two weeks ago. It was a common multiplayer phone game. The gamer worried there might be disruption. But wasn't very worried about it.

I support neither. I independently question the information offered. It seems reminiscent of WW1, trench warfare.

Yes my point it is indeed reminiscent. Territory and territory held. Russia is indeed defending acquisitions. While also funnelling an enemy into choke points and surrounding any gains.

Except despite of this, a lot of protocols seem to be missing. Some of it is due to capturing objectives instead of forcing victory. Some are due to the enemy and its support faced.

But generally an opposing power structure is targeted completely degrading its capacity to command. As services and infrastructure of every description is cut off disrupting any ability to counter and command. Further flight plays as big a role as any ground warfare, completely pummelling an enemy into positions overrun by the ground.

Instead there are much bigger fortified lines, trenches, any enemy command centers haven't really been targeted until captured, and then commanded, many services remain partially or intact. The enemy is constantly being resupplied. As any frontline edges forwards.

It seems to be stalling. Compared to otherwise modern war. There are politics involved. Yes. There is a risk of escalation. The country is enormous. It has huge conscription. But said.

Ukraine's main buildings still linger large. Its services are still largely operational. I know this I was playing computer games with people in Kharkiv two weeks ago. It was a common multiplayer phone game. The gamer worried there might be disruption. But wasn't very worried about it.

Yes my point it is indeed reminiscent. Territory and territory held. Russia is indeed defending acquisitions. While also funnelling an enemy into choke points and surrounding any gains.

Except despite of this, a lot of protocols seem to be missing. Some of it is due to capturing objectives instead of forcing victory. Some are due to the enemy and its support faced.

But generally an opposing power structure is targeted completely degrading its capacity to command. As services and infrastructure of every description is cut off disrupting any ability to counter and command. Further flight plays as big a role as any ground warfare, completely pummelling an enemy into positions overrun by the ground.

Instead there are much bigger fortified lines, trenches, any enemy command centers haven't really been targeted until captured, and then commanded, many services remain partially or intact. The enemy is constantly being resupplied. As any frontline edges forwards.

It seems to be stalling. Compared to otherwise modern war. There are politics involved. Yes. There is a risk of escalation. The country is enormous. It has huge conscription. But said.

Ukraine's main buildings still linger large. Its services are still largely operational. I know this I was playing computer games with people in Kharkiv two weeks ago.

Yes my point it is indeed reminiscent. Territory and territory held. Russia is indeed defending acquisitions. While also funnelling an enemy into choke points and surrounding any gains.

Except despite of this, a lot of protocols seem to be missing. Some of it is due to capturing objectives instead of forcing victory. Some are due to the enemy and its support faced.

But generally an opposing power structure is targeted completely degrading its capacity to command. As services and infrastructure of every description is cut off disrupting any ability to counter and command. Further flight plays as big a role as any ground warfare, completely pummelling an enemy into positions overrun by the ground.

Instead there are much bigger fortified lines, trenches, any enemy command centers haven't really been targeted until captured, and then commanded, many services remain partially or intact. The enemy is constantly being resupplied. As any frontline edges forwards.