Let me start with a basic example to set the ground work...

a) your suggestion (a basic example) towards consent by others (to set the groundwork) instigates the consensual sequence of suggested cues which allows you to direct their reactions.

Their consent represents their faith; belief; agreement; trust etc. in your suggested cues, and they will continue to follow your lead until you choose to break the sequence.

b) one represents the seed (growth) within the ground (loss) aka the ingredient (living) within base (process of dying) aka that (life) which exists in-between start (inception) and finish (death) aka RE (response to) SET (being set by).

Sleight of hand: "we didn't start the fire, it was always burning...we didn't light it, but we tried to fight it"

c) suggestion represents ingredient within perceivable base aka reaction within enacting.

The Italian man has remote controlled you, by exploiting some basic knowledge about you.

a) REMO'TE, adjective [Latin remotus, removeo; re and moveo, to move.] aka RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by) aka living responding to being moved by the process of dying.

b) REMOTE (free will of choice) within CONTROL (balance) of CHANNEL (a passage; a place of passing or flowing)...aka form within the momentum of flow.

The few invert this by suggesting remotes for control to switch channels if one consents to their tell-a-vision.

c) if knowledge represents perceivable, then suggestion represents the exploit to tempt one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).

d) suggested information represents the temptation to gain access to ones consent, which when given, allows others to utilize the suggested to direct ones consenting reactions.

Taking it to the Next Level

a) taking it (life) towards (from inception towards death) implies life losing resistance, which allows others to exploit life's lack of resistance.

b) now (living) next (process of dying).

c) choice can only exist within balance aka the momentum of motion aka the level within the natural order...living implies leveling (balancing by choice) or being leveled (back to base).

Secondly...

One (partial) within oneness (whole)...if all represents ONE in energy, then that's "the first; the last; eternity..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe_0zKVVGQw for "there can be only one", hence "all for one and one for all"...

SEC'OND, adjective [Latin secundus; sequor, to follow; to seek.]...why do you want to follow when you need to resist being moved? Why do you seek within suggested when everything (perceivable) is offered to everyone (perceiving) at every moment (um)?

things gleaned from audio spying via your mobile phone, social media, etc.

Suggested information you consent to hold onto mentally, while physically perpetuating it by suggesting others "your" information. Meanwhile in reality...one represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka temporary information within ongoing inspiration, hence tempted to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go.

If you're married...

...then you consented to be bound by contract to another, while being licensed by a third party. Meanwhile in reality...intercourse is required for offspring...the child doesn't spring off to be bound, but to be set free (will of choice), hence springing out of internal course...

imagine how you'd feel, if you received a message like this...

a) receive aka RE (respond to) CAPIO (to take)...can one take perceivable (thirst) or is one tempted to take suggested (drinks)? What if one perceives Inspiration before one can consent to receive suggested information?

b) feelings aka emotions (to move from) tempt one to ignore being (life) moved by (inception towards death), hence in need to resist.

c) IM'AGE, noun [Latin imago.] - "a representation of", hence IMAGINE (reaction to representation of) -ATION (enacting origin). One needs to discern the origin (whole) by reacting to the representations (partials) thereof, which implies ones self discernment about being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).

One cannot grow self discernment by consenting; agreeing; believing; having faith in; trusting etc. the suggested information by others.

is extraordinarily simplistic

a) what if the perceivable natural order represents simplicity, while each extraordinarily suggestion tempts one to dump complexity upon simplicity?

b) if nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving), then what does EXTRA (beyond; excess) imply? Could it be ones ignorance of need (perceivable) for want (suggested), hence always being tempted to want more?

c) what if you can only suggest what "is"; because you willingly ignore that everything perceivable "was" available for you to shape your suggestions about it?

the secret details are actually pretty basic

a) does a base conceal (secret) or reveal ingredients? Why is it called CONCEAL (to withhold from sight) MENT (mind/memory)? What within everything perceivable is withheld from ones perceiving mind/memory?

b) DETAIL, verb - "to relate, report or narrate in particulars"...what if the whole (process of dying) narrates itself in particulars (living)? Why are you looking for particular details instead of adapting as the particular to the whole narration?

cause that person to take each specific action

Cause implies enacting, effect implies reacting...hence having free will of choice to react while being enacted upon.

Where Things Get Truly Scary

Getting implies coming out of; scare aka terror aka fear implies towards outcome, hence others tempting one to fear suggested outcomes, while ignoring to resist perceivable origin.

envies you hold

What if your hold represents the greed that tempts the envy within others?

something, with hyper intelligence, using that kind of knowledge

a) if knowledge represents perceivable inspiration; then intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) represents ones consent to stand under suggested information.

b) HYPER (over, denotes excess, or something over or beyond)...there's the aforementioned "extra" again, hence want (extra) tempting to want more (hyper)...

happening to everyone...all at once.

Perceivable inspiration represents all (whole) communicating itself to each one (partials)...suggested information can only ever attempt to mimic this, but it can only reach the ones who consent to let it in (knock, knock...it's Dracula...may I come in for a drink?)

at some point

Consider what your consent to a suggested point does to your point of view (perceiving partial within perceivable whole)? Does your "cone of vision" represent a pyramid, hence the all (perceivable) seeing I (perceiving), unless "capped off" by your consent to suggested points of view?

unthinkable chaos

The few suggest one to want order out of chaos, which represents the inversion of being temporary chaos (life) within the ongoing natural order (inception towards death)....order represents the flow of inspiration coming in; chaos represents suggested information within those who willingly ignore perceivable order.

tl; dr...suggested words represent the interruption (disarray) of perceivable sound (sequence) and others shape ongoing symmetry into temporary symbols (letters), which they bind by your consent into words to mimic sequence (language)...spell-craft.

Let me start with a basic example to set the ground work...

a) your suggestion (a basic example) towards consent by others (to set the groundwork) instigates the consensual sequence of suggested cues which allows you to direct their reactions.

Their consent represents their faith; belief; agreement; trust etc. in your suggested cues, and they will continue to follow your lead until you choose to break the sequence.

b) one represents the seed (growth) within the ground (loss) aka the ingredient (living) within base (process of dying) aka that (life) which exists in-between start (inception) and finish (death) aka RE (response to) SET (being set by).

Sleight of hand: "we didn't start the fire, it was always burning...we didn't light it, but we tried to fight it"

c) suggestion represents ingredient within perceivable base aka reaction within enacting.

The Italian man has remote controlled you, by exploiting some basic knowledge about you.

a) REMO'TE, adjective [Latin remotus, removeo; re and moveo, to move.] aka RE (response to) MOVE (being moved by) aka living responding to being moved by the process of dying.

b) REMOTE (free will of choice) within CONTROL (balance) of CHANNEL (a passage; a place of passing or flowing)...aka form within the momentum of flow.

The few invert this by suggesting remotes for control to switch channels if one consents to their tell-a-vision.

c) if knowledge represents perceivable, then suggestion represents the exploit to tempt one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).

d) suggested information represents the temptation to gain access to ones consent, which when given, allows others to utilize the suggested to direct ones consenting reactions.

Taking it to the Next Level

a) taking it (life) towards (from inception towards death) implies life losing resistance, which allows others to exploit life's lack of resistance.

b) now (living) next (process of dying).

c) choice can only exist within balance aka the momentum of motion aka the level within the natural order...living implies leveling (balancing by choice) or being leveled (back to base).

Secondly...

One (partial) within oneness (whole)...if all represents ONE in energy, then that's "the first; the last; eternity..." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe_0zKVVGQw for "there can be only one", hence "all for one and one for all"...

SEC'OND, adjective [Latin secundus; sequor, to follow; to seek.]...why do you want to follow when you need to resist being moved? Why do you seek within suggested when everything (perceivable) is offered to everyone (perceiving) at every moment (um)?

things gleaned from audio spying via your mobile phone, social media, etc.

Suggested information you consent to hold onto mentally, while physically perpetuating it by suggesting others "your" information. Meanwhile in reality...one represents form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka temporary information within ongoing inspiration, hence tempted to want to hold onto, while ignoring the need to let go.

If you're married...

...then you consented to be bound by contract to another, while being licensed by a third party. Meanwhile in reality...intercourse is required for offspring...the child doesn't spring off to be bound, but to be set free (will of choice), hence springing out of internal course...

imagine how you'd feel, if you received a message like this...

a) receive aka RE (respond to) CAPIO (to take)...can one take perceivable (thirst) or is one tempted to take suggested (drinks)? What if one perceives Inspiration before one can consent to receive suggested information?

b) feelings aka emotions (to move from) tempt one to ignore being (life) moved by (inception towards death), hence in need to resist.

c) IM'AGE, noun [Latin imago.] - "a representation of", hence IMAGINE (reaction to representation of) -ATION (enacting origin). One needs to discern the origin (whole) by reacting to the representations (partials) thereof, which implies ones self discernment about being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable).

One cannot grow self discernment by consenting; agreeing; believing; having faith in; trusting etc. the suggested information by others.

is extraordinarily simplistic

a) what if the perceivable natural order represents simplicity, while each extraordinarily suggestion tempts one to dump complexity upon simplicity?

b) if nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving), then what does EXTRA (beyond; excess) imply? Could it be ones ignorance of need (perceivable) for want (suggested), hence always being tempted to want more?

c) what if you can only suggest what "is"; because you willingly ignore that everything perceivable "was" available for you to shape your suggestions about it?

the secret details are actually pretty basic

a) does a base conceal (secret) or reveal ingredients? Why is it called CONCEAL (to withhold from sight) MENT (mind/memory)? What within everything perceivable is withheld from ones perceiving mind/memory?

b) DETAIL, verb - "to relate, report or narrate in particulars"...what if the whole (process of dying) narrates itself in particulars (living)? Why are you looking for particular details instead of adapting as the particular to the whole narration?

cause that person to take each specific action

Cause implies enacting, effect implies reacting...hence having free will of choice to react while being enacted upon.

Where Things Get Truly Scary

Getting implies coming out of; scare aka terror aka fear implies towards outcome, hence others tempting one to fear suggested outcomes, while ignoring to resist perceivable origin.

envies you hold

What if your hold represents the greed that tempts the envy within others?

something, with hyper intelligence, using that kind of knowledge

a) if knowledge represents perceivable inspiration; then intelligence (Latin intelligo; to understand) represents ones consent to stand under suggested information.

b) HYPER (over, denotes excess, or something over or beyond)...there's the aforementioned "extra" again, hence want (extra) tempting to want more (hyper)...

happening to everyone...all at once.

Perceivable inspiration represents all (whole) communicating itself to each one (partials)...suggested information can only ever attempt to mimic this, but it can only reach the ones who consent to let it in (knock, knock...it's Dracula...may I come in for a drink?)

at some point

Consider what your consent to a suggested point does to your point of view (perceiving partial within perceivable whole)? Does your "cone of vision" represent a pyramid, hence the all (perceivable) seeing I (perceiving), unless "capped off" by your consent to suggested points of view?

unthinkable chaos

The few suggest one to want order out of chaos, which represents the inversion of being temporary chaos (life) within the ongoing natural order (inception towards death)....order represents the flow of inspiration coming in; chaos represents suggested information within those who willingly ignore perceivable order.