Sure, but evidence is not the “slam dunk” it is often misrepresented as.

The primary evidence is that the idea that a large rock could float in the skies perpetually is stupid, and a violation of many scientific laws - most notably the law of gravity (which is thousands of years old, not merely hundreds).

Another evidence is the astronomical observations of stars seen through the darkened portion of the moon over the years. Lunar transient phenomena are also an evidence that something is fundamentally amiss about our modern conceptions (mythology actually) of the moon.

The monochromatic color scheme of the moon is also another evidence, as well as its relatively uniform luminescence - which is inconsistent with a spherical reflector of any kind.

You may be intrigued by the statements, from a man claiming to be a scientist, by the name of professor foster recorded by the australian broadcasting company prior to the supposed moon landings - providing yet more anecdotal evidence - though sadly he does not go into the specifics of the methodologies employed to make his scientific determinations.

Sure, but evidence is not the “slam dunk” it is often misrepresented as.

The primary evidence is that the idea that a large rock could float in the skies perpetually is stupid, and a violation of many scientific laws - most notably the law of gravity (which is thousands of years old, not merely hundreds).

Another evidence is the astronomical observations of stars seen through the darkened portion of the moon over the years. Lunar transient phenomena are also an evidence that something is fundamentally amiss about our modern conceptions (mythology actually) of the moon.

The monochromatic color scheme of the moon is also another evidence, as well as its relatively uniform luminescence - which is inconsistent with a spherical reflector of any kind.

You may be intrigued by the statements, from a man claiming to be a scientist, by the name of professor foster given to the australian broadcasting company prior to the supposed moon landings - providing yet more anecdotal evidence - though sadly he does not go into the specifics of the methodologies employed to make his scientific determinations.