It's shown how PROMIS was indeed able in 1997 to up and download info to satellites.
So, the data is on satellite, or downloaded from satellite. OK. Then what? Satellite is not an endpoint in either case. That data should somehow be put on satellite from somewhere or downloaded from satellite to somewhere. Where is that "somewhere"?
5G base station will/does not store the data IMO.
At least, unlike satellites, they could be equipped with data storage devices like HDD or SSD. HDDs are too heavy and fragile for satellites and SSDs have limited lifetime and they can't be easily replaced as in base stations. Also SSD are vulnerable to data corruption by cosmic rays.
I don't know for shure if 5G base stations really equipped with data storages, but that assumption is at least technically possible.
I can name two mainframe computers in my home state that are being used to store this information as we speak.
That mainframes have to had an IP address, just like satellite uplink stations. Ownership of IP addresses is public info. As soon as you know IP range assigned to satellite network and IP range assigned to data storage you could move further in your research.
The statement that "chip could connect with satellite" is senseless alone, without research of data paths.
iron oxides as nanotechnical transmit/receive signals in real time. no real need for storage
Really, I'm tired from that "nano" crap. Nearly anything you use now have nano inside. Every single MCU or IC is literally nanotechnology, so adding "nano" to anything have no any sense.
Again, transmission of signals is not self-sufficient thing. Signal have a source and destination point. You are still talking about all that "nano" crap on one end of data transmission path, completely omitting the other.
Fuck, what the hell is going on with you, people? "They have nano satellite chips in our things!!!" - "OK, let's find out who exactly getting or sending data to that chips, uncover their back channels and connections" - "No, we don't care about that, we don't need to know that, we should not talk about that, they have nano satellite chips in our things111!!!!!"
It's shown how PROMIS was indeed able in 1997 to up and download info to satellites.
So, the data is on satellite, or downloaded from satellite. OK. Then what? Satellite is not an endpoint in either case. That data should somehow be put on satellite from somewhere or downloaded from satellite to somewhere. Where is that "somewhere"?
5G base station will/does not store the data IMO.
At least, unlike satellites, they could be equipped with data storage devices like HDD or SSD. HDDs are too heavy and fragile for satellites and SSDs have limited lifetime and they can't be easily replaced as in base stations. Also SSD are vulnerable to data corruption by cosmic rays.
I don't know for shure if 5G base stations really equipped with data storages, but that assumption is at least technically possible.
I can name two mainframe computers in my home state that are being used to store this information as we speak.
That mainframes have to had an IP address, just like satellite uplink stations. Ownership of IP addresses is public info. As soon as you know IP range assigned to satellite network and IP range assigned to data storage you could move further in your research.
The statement that "chip could connect with satellite" is senseless alone, without research of data paths.
iron oxides as nanotechnical transmit/receive signals in real time. no real need for storage
Really, I'm tired from that "nano" crap. Nearly anything you use now have nano inside. Every single MCU or IC is literally nanotechnology, so adding "nano" to anything have no any sense.
Again, transmission of signals is not self-sufficient thing. Signal have a source and destination point. You are still talking about all that "nano" crap on one end of data transmission path, completely omitting the other.
Fuck, what the hell is going on with you, people? "They have nano satellite chips in our things!!!" - "OK, let's find out who exactly getting or sending data to that chips, uncover their back channels and connections" - "No, we don't care about that, we don't need to know that, they have nano satellite chips in our things111!!!!!"