Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

One of the corner-stone of modern "democracy" is a declared necessity of elections necessary for authority rotation.

But literally none of "democtrats" ever talk about rotation of higher level authorities, like IMF, WEF, WHO and other persons and institutions that represent higher levels of authorities than country leaders.

According to the logic of "democrats" if you must have a right to elect a local sheriff or mayor, with many order of magnitude you must have a right not only select all that global institutions, but also must have a right to vote for changing state regime, political system and other things that is much more important than some prime ministers or presidents.

If "democrats" do not even allow a thought about electing bosses of local bosses, than their idea of "democracy" is just a hoax.

Obviously there is no any sense to choose from puppets of one master, regardless of if master is some person or some institution.

Until "democrats" began to talk about direct elections and rotation of UN, IMF, WEF, WHO and other global institutions, there are no any sense to take their propaganda seriously at all.

PS: That is not about validity of elections procedure itself, we all know that they could be easily rigged, it is about giant and obvious hole in logic of "democracy" propaganda.

PPS: It is also about worldwide "democrats", not just US Democratic Party alone.

2 years ago
2 score
Reason: None provided.

One of the corner-stone of modern "democracy" is a declared necessity of elections necessary for authority rotation.

But literally none of "democtrats" ever talk about rotation of higher level authorities, like IMF, WEF, WHO and other persons and institutions that represent higher levels of authorities than country leaders.

According to the logic of "democrats" if you must have a right to elect a local sheriff or mayor, with many order of magnitude you must have a right not only select all that global institutions, but also must have a right to vote for changing state regime, political system and other things that is much more important than some prime ministers or presidents.

If "democrats" do not even allow a thought about electing bosses of local bosses, than their idea of "democracy" is just a hoax.

Obviously there is no any sense to choose from puppets of one master, regardless of if master is some person or some institution.

Until "democrats" began to talk about direct elections and rotation of UN, IMF, WEF, WHO and other global institutions, there are no any sense to take their propaganda seriously at all.

PS: That is not about validity of elections procedure itself, we all know that they could be easily rigged, it is about giant and obvious hole in logic of "democracy" propaganda.

PPS: It is also about worldwide "democrats", not just US Democratic Party alone.

2 years ago
2 score
Reason: Original

One of the corner-stone of modern "democracy" is a declared necessity of elections necessary for authority rotation.

But literally none of "democtrats" ever talk about rotation of higher level authorities, like IMF, WEF, WHO and other persons and institutions that represent higher levels of authorities than country leaders.

According to the logic of "democrats" if you must have a right to elect a local sheriff or mayor, with many order of magnitude you must have a right not only select all that global institutions, but also must have a right to vote for changing state regime, political system and other things that is much more important than some prime ministers or presidents.

If "democrats" do not even allow a thought about electing bosses of local bosses, than their idea of "democracy" is just a hoax.

Obviously there is no any sense to choose from puppets of one master, regardless of if master is some person or some institution.

Until "democrats" began to talk about direct elections and rotation of UN, IMF, WEF, WHO and other global institutions, there are no any sense to take their propaganda seriously at all.

PS: That is not about validity of elections procedure itself, we all know that they could be easily rigged, it is about giant and obvious hole in logic of "democracy" propaganda.

2 years ago
1 score