Pardon the rambling chaos of this comment, I wrote it with voice to text while walking:

I'm not suggesting that the world is flat. It doesn't make any sense that it would be, unless we were literally in some form of Truman Show style simulation. But, it definitely hasn't been proven to be a globe, either. The supposedly non-composited images from space do not corroborate each other, because the continents are sized incorrectly and differently from photo to photo, and the colors change drastically (i'm not talking about film differences over the years, I'm talking about like entirely different apparent biomes). Every bit of the math involved in proving the globe also supports flat earth, including the scientist back in the whatever hundreds who calculated the size of the globe Earth using shadows.

It's one of those topics were the only way to get somebody to hear you out is to say "just go do some research and then tell me what you think", because you'll be surprised. Again, I don't believe in FE. It hasn't been proven, either. The fact that we can't even confidently understand the geometry of where we live, without indoctrination (how else would you know the Earth is a globe if somebody didn't tell you in school? Would you feel the roundness? Would you actually see something dropping below the horizon with your own bare eyes? You might see something Fade into the horizon, but pull up a large telescope and you'll see it is still there, etc.) is grounds enough for me to be interested in learning more. If you don't want to, don't take the pill, just ignore it. But if you care enough to debate about it in a comment with me, I suspect you were interested enough somewhere deep down inside that you at least want to explore. Rather than starting with flat earth content, I recommend watching a compilation of NASA fakery. Flat earth is more like a vehicle for research, because even though most of these people are working from the confirmation bias of believing that the Earth is flat, what they are really doing is exploring. They are taking something that can't be simply taken for its face value and going in trying to prove or disprove it. For example, even attempts to make fun of flat earthers end up sending up Balloons to the upper atmosphere with wide angle cameras and using the camera distortion to show that the Earth is flat, which people than immediately and unequivocally debunk by showing that even the math of the globe earth doesn't support seeing the kind of curve that they are seeing with their lenses. If you go down that rabbit hole, you will be absolutely stunned at the amount of real information that is out there in the amount of propaganda there is trying to prove that the world is a globe. That alone is enough reason to be interested (why is there so much money and effort put into convincingg people of the shape of our world?).

I'm not suggesting that the world is flat. It doesn't make any sense that it would be, unless we were literally in some form of Truman Show style simulation. But, it definitely hasn't been proven to be a globe, either. The supposedly non-composited images from space do not corroborate each other, because the continents are sized incorrectly and differently from photo to photo, and the colors change drastically (i'm not talking about film differences over the years, I'm talking about like entirely different apparent biomes). Every bit of the math involved in proving the globe also supports flat earth, including the scientist back in the whatever hundreds who calculated the size of the globe Earth using shadows.

It's one of those topics were the only way to get somebody to hear you out is to say "just go do some research and then tell me what you think", because you'll be surprised. Again, I don't believe in FE. It hasn't been proven, either. The fact that we can't even confidently understand the geometry of where we live, without indoctrination (how else would you know the Earth is a globe if somebody didn't tell you in school? Would you feel the roundness? Would you actually see something dropping below the horizon with your own bare eyes? You might see something Fade into the horizon, but pull up a large telescope and you'll see it is still there, etc.) is grounds enough for me to be interested in learning more. If you don't want to, don't take the pill, just ignore it. But if you care enough to debate about it in a comment with me, I suspect you were interested enough somewhere deep down inside that you at least want to explore. Rather than starting with flat earth content, I recommend watching a compilation of NASA fakery. Flat earth is more like a vehicle for research, because even though most of these people are working from the confirmation bias of believing that the Earth is flat, what they are really doing is exploring. They are taking something that can't be simply taken for its face value and going in trying to prove or disprove it. For example, even attempts to make fun of flat earthers end up sending up Balloons to the upper atmosphere with wide angle cameras and using the camera distortion to show that the Earth is flat, which people than immediately and unequivocally debunk by showing that even the math of the globe earth doesn't support seeing the kind of curve that they are seeing with their lenses. If you go down that rabbit hole, you will be absolutely stunned at the amount of real information that is out there in the amount of propaganda there is trying to prove that the world is a globe. That alone is enough reason to be interested (why is there so much money and effort put into convincingg people of the shape of our world?).