Ok. I'll play your game.

On your original argument about AI, Your actual proof is what?

1. AI doesn't need to be sentient to fuck things up, but it can also be unplugged.
2. Decades away by military... how many times I've heard that argument. Proof? You've got none. ML is down to speed / complexity of the hw. Military doesn't run their own fabs, chips, ML protocols and hw designs on ML. If they did, we'd know about the fabs and the breakthroughs. Just doesn't stand up to the sniff test
3. Your argument clearly shows lack of understanding of AI vs ML and the dangers of both. Expert you are not. Come back after 20 years.
4. I've actually studied and taught cognitive biases, none of which I demonstrated in my earlier post.Try harder. Started my AI studies in 1993. Come back when you understand the basic principles.