Yawn. Nonsense. It is not viable yet. Neither is it cheap.

They've managed to produce a return. Harnessing for long enough to gain potentially something back

However the parts aren't sustainable or cost effective. Meanwhile the potential for output isn't unlimited. It is harnessing for long enough to get returns. How much by the comparison needed to generate it? Further how much energy is provided, wattage, and how often does it stress the means harnessing.

Tediously out by larger margins if indeed it becomes the next standard adopted.

Currently fission is still the reactors being constructed, currently, there are builds and plans for a number more and in smaller sizes.

If such a breakthrough is imminent then why indeed are fission reactors being constructed. The demand. Because Fusion hasn't got a working model generating for the grid. It is still experimental.

I guess I read that article after I read the headline. It is as confirmed decades away. But it has been like this for years. Everytime it wants more funding. The breakthrough was announced earlier this year and also last. Breaking temperatures, and harnessing longer. Enough to potentially power something, but not enough to sustain the grid or indefinitely. In the meantime fission is being constructed and it's designs are getting smaller. I don't know why it calls it clean and sustainable. Can anybody else tell me about electro magnets and superheated plasma. Irony I guess it's not the nuclear waste?

Yawn. Nonsense. It is not viable yet. Neither is it cheap.

They've managed to produce a return. Harnessing for long enough to gain potentially something back

However the parts aren't sustainable or cost effective. Meanwhile the potential for output isn't unlimited. It is harnessing for long enough to get returns. How much by the comparison needed to generate it? Further how much energy is provided, wattage, and how often does it stress the means harnessing.

Tediously out by larger margins if indeed it becomes the next standard adopted.

Currently fission is still the reactors being constructed, currently, there are builds and plans for a number more and in smaller sizes.

If such a breakthrough is imminent then why indeed are fission reactors being constructed. The demand. Becaue Fusion hasn't got a working model generating for the grid. It is still experimental.

I guess I read that article after I read the headline. It is as confirmed decades away. But it has been like this for years. Everytime it wants more funding. The breakthrough was announced earlier this year and also last. Breaking temperatures, and harnessing longer. Enough to potentially power something, but not enough to sustain the grid or indefinitely. In the meantime fission is being constructed and it's designs are getting smaller. I don't know why it calls it clean and sustainable. Can anybody else tell me about electro magnets and superheated plasma. Irony I guess it's not the nuclear waste?

Yawn. Nonsense. It is not viable yet. Neither is it cheap.

They've managed to produce a return. Harnessing for long enough to gain potentially something back

However the parts aren't sustainable or cost effective. Meanwhile the potential for output isn't unlimited. It is harnessing for long enough to get returns. How much by the comparison needed to generate it? Further how much energy is provided, wattage, and how often does it stress the means harnessing.

Tediously out by larger margins if indeed it becomes the next standard adopted.

Currently fission is still the reactors being constructed, currently, there are builds and plans for a number more and in smaller sizes.

If such a breakthrough is imminent then why indeed are fission reactors being constructed. The demand. Becaue Fusion hasn't got a working model generating for the grid. It is still experimental.

I guess I read that article after I read the headline. It is as confirmed decades away. But it has been like this for years. Everytime it wants more funding. The breakthrough was announced earlier this year and also last. Breaking temperatures, and harnessing longer. Enough to potentially power something, but not enough to sustain the grid or indefinitely. In the meantime fission is being constructed and it's designs are getting smaller. I don't know why it calls in clean. Can anybody else tell me about electro magnets and superheated plasma. Irony I guess it's not the nuclear waste?

Yawn. Nonsense. It is not viable yet. Neither is it cheap.

They've managed to produce a return. Harnessing for long enough to gain potentially something back

However the parts aren't sustainable or cost effective. Meanwhile the potential for output isn't unlimited. It is harnessing for long enough to get returns. How much by the comparison needed to generate it? Further how much energy is provided, wattage, and how often does it stress the means harnessing.

Tediously out by larger margins if indeed it becomes the next standard adopted.

Currently fission is still being developed and it is still the reactors being constructed, currently, there are builds and plans for a number more.

If such a breakthrough is imminent then why indeed are fission reactors being constructed. The demand. Fusion hasn't got a working model generating for the grid. It is still experimental.