Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You "encourage discussion" as much as a tranny school teacher does about the children's gender

Except the discussion/research i am encouraging is entirely optional, and there is no disciplinary penalty for abstaining/refusing. I detest groomers, same as you.

Anything that goes against your cult is attacked

This is a tricky one to respond to. On the one hand, the heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop does encourage, foster, and propagate such false/manufactured enmity and slander. So it is not unreasonable for this to have been your experience with others (not me!).

On the other, many would feel that you - right now - are the one who is (reflexively/conditioned to be) attacking simply because i encourage discussion and research “against your cult”.

For my part, i am strongly opposed to the flat earth psyop, cults, and to the slander/ad hominem/“attack” they encourage. I am equally opposed to the conditioned (through rote under the guise of education, from childhood) response of the globe model believers and proponents to attack others merely for having differing/contrary views - that you seem to be exhibiting.

Discussion is only hindered by such emotional tactic, and that is its clear purpose. Divided we are weak. Working together, we are strong. I’m sure you recognize that our common enemy is acutely aware of this.

1 year ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You "encourage discussion" as much as a tranny school teacher does about the children's gender

Except the discussion/research i am encouraging is entirely optional, and there is no disciplinary penalty for abstaining/refusing. I detest groomers, same as you.

Anything that goes against your cult is attacked

This is a tricky one to respond to. On the one hand, the heavily advertised (i.e. funded) flat earth psyop does encourage, foster, and propagate such false/manufactured enmity and slander. So it is not unreasonable for this to have been your experience with others (not me!).

On the other, many would feel that you - right now - are the one who is (reflexively/conditioned to be) attacking simply because i encourage discussion and research “against your cult”.

For my part, i am strongly opposed to the flat earth psyop, cults, and to the slander/ad hominem/“attack” they encourage. I am equally opposed to the conditioned (through rote under the guise of education, from childhood) response of the globe model believers and proponents to attack others merely for having differing/contrary views - that you seem to be displaying.

Discussion is only hindered by such emotional tactic, and that is its clear purpose. Divided we are weak. Working together, we are strong. I’m sure you recognize that our common enemy is acutely aware of this.

1 year ago
1 score