They provoked it to cause the renewables. They provoked it to contain them. Bog Russia down completely. If it alludes to peace it's the Cold War. Competing technology. In the meantime it has put them in a bigger corner. If they really whatever far more condemnation isolating them more. Let's suggest it takes Kiev. Or even deals for any territory. Big stupid wall again. As most diplomats are ejected cut off. Of course it has caused red lines and sides again. Competition. But there's also opportunity to regime change.
For the sake of argument how many European nations have just stated 2030-2035 no more gas cars. It was previously by 2040 or even 2050. By slicing the flow it diverts it. Suddenly the agenda becomes force other tech through quickly. In the meantime they're forcing and exploiting a reset. By collapsing it. But stupidly coal has just increased in usage massively. So I mean. It's all uncertain anyway.
But the problem is how much does it all collapse first and does it provoke wider conflict anyway.
I am sure they can deal in 10 seconds. If it wasn't serving some other point.
Who fucking knows except the timing was perfect and now look at it. It is forcing collapse, not because it did, but because it is causing a bigger narrative. Of course there's all this other stuff happening creating the perfect storm. But it's had planning and intent and agenda. Or what?
If they were serious about war. They wouldn't Biden or Sunak. Or even Marcon. Sure they could pull a trigger but who'd march into it. Hahaha. Nobody would even pass it through their governments. Blunder into it, by looking weak. Yea. But charge into that or another conflict. Hahaha. They haven't got national backing.
So what are they achieving? Forcing change by.. It's just getting worse first.
They provoked it to cause the renewables. They provoked it to contain them. Bog Russia down completely. If it alludes to peace it's the Cold War. Competing technology. In the meantime it has put them in a bigger corner. If they really whatever far more condemnation isolating them more. Let's suggest it takes Kiev. Or even deals for any territory. Big stupid wall again. As most diplomats are ejected cut off. Of course it has caused red lines and sides again. Competition. But there's also opportunity to regime change.
For the sake of argument how many European nations have just stated 2030-2035 no more gas cars. It was previously by 2040 or even 2050. By slicing the flow it diverts it. Suddenly the agenda becomes force other tech through quickly. In the meantime they're forcing and exploiting a reset. By collapsing it. But stupidly coal has just increased in usage massively. So I mean. It's all uncertain anyway.
But the problem is how much does it all collapse first and does it provoke wider conflict anyway.
I am sure they can deal in 10 seconds. If it wasn't serving some other point.
Who fucking knows except the timing was perfect and now look at it. It is forcing collapse, not because it did, but because it is causing a bigger narrative. Of course there's all this other stuff happening creating the perfect storm. But it's had planning and intent and agenda. Or what?
If they were serious about war. They wouldn't Biden or Sunak. Or even Marcon. Sure they could pull a trigger but who'd march into it. Hahaha. Nobody would even pass it through their governments. Blunder into it, by looking weak. Yea. But charge into that or another conflict. Hahaha. They haven't got national backing.
So what are they achieving?
They provoked it to cause the renewables. They provoked it to contain them. Bog Russia down completely. If it alludes to peace it's the Cold War. Competing technology. In the meantime it has put them in a bigger corner. If they really whatever far more condemnation isolating them more. Let's suggest it takes Kiev. Or even deals for any territory. Big stupid wall again. As most diplomats are ejected cut off. Of course it has caused red lines and sides again. Competition. But there's also opportunity to regime change.
For the sake of argument how many European nations have just stated 2030-2035 no more gas cars. It was previously by 2040 or even 2050. By slicing the flow it diverts it. Suddenly the agenda becomes force other tech through quickly. In the meantime they're forcing and exploiting a reset. By collapsing it. But stupidly coal has just increased in usage massively. So I mean. It's all uncertain anyway.
But the problem is how much does it all collapse first and does it provoke wider conflict anyway.
I am sure they can deal in 10 seconds. If it wasn't serving some other point.
Who fucking knows except the timing was perfect and now look at it. It is forcing collapse, not because it did, but because it is causing a bigger narrative. Of course there's all this other stuff happening creating the perfect storm. But it's had planning and intent and agenda. Or what?