Source?
Russians don't use that tactic. It is accounted as not honorable and absolute no-go. Ukrainians use. Ukrainians are fooled Russians. Who could convince that it is OK and teach Russians to use that tactic, if only NATO teach them to fight?
Then why did Russia bitch and moan and cry so much about the bridge?
Didn't saw that here. Typical reaction - "Ukronazis did that again". Allowing Ukraine to bomb Dontesk make much more rage. Something tell me that it is Western MSM who told you about that "so much".
And those soon will be in range of Ukrainian Artillery.
They already are. But that stupid and shitty HIMAR are easily downed by nearly any Russian anti-air protection devices.
Interesting, does Lokheed-Martin pay for that HIMARS hype? Russians making that HIMARSes from 1943 in enormous amounts, you know, we are the Gods of rocketry, and Ukraine had much more powerful and advanced Russian MLRSes in enormous amounts, they had at least 80 pcs of only Smerch MLRS that is way more better than HIMARS. But, obvilusly that does not help them, so small number of worse HIMARSes will not help them too.
You know nothing about military tactics.
I had militatry education and training and got leutenant rank after university, as every male (real male, not some gender shit) student in USSR. So, I know enough about tactics. And what is your military rank?
Source?
Russians don't use that tactic. It is accounted as not honorable and absolute no-go. Ukrainians use. Ukrainians are fooled Russians. Who could convince that it is OK and teach Russians to use that tactic, if only NATO teach them to fight?
Then why did Russia bitch and moan and cry so much about the bridge?
Didn't saw that here. Typical reaction - "Ukronazis did that again". Allowing Ukraine to bomb Dontesk make much more rage. Something tell me that it is Western MSM who told you about that "so much".
And those soon will be in range of Ukrainian Artillery.
They already are. But that stupid HIMARS are easily downed by nearly any Russian anti-air protection devices.
You know nothing about military tactics.
I had militatry education and training and got leutenant rank after university, as every male (real male, not some gender shit) student in USSR. So, I know enough about tactics. And what is your military rank?
Source?
Russians don't use that tactic. It is accounted as not honorable and absolute no-go. Ukrainians use. Ukrainians are fooled Russians. Who could convince that it is OK and teach Russians to use that tactic, if only NATO teach them to fight?
Then why did Russia bitch and moan and cry so much about the bridge?
Didn't saw that here. Typical reaction - "Ukronazis did that again". Allowing Ukraine to bomb Dontesk make much more rage. Something tell me that it is Western MSM who told you about that "so much".
And those soon will be in range of Ukrainian Artillery.
They already are. But that stupid HIMARS are easily downed by simple Russian anti-air protection devices.
You know nothing about military tactics.
I had militatry education and training and got leutenant rank after university, as every male (real male, not some gender shit) student in USSR. So, I know enough about tactics. And what is your military rank?