A debatable solar flare. Isn't a unclear war.

A tactical nuke I agree could be localised. It could be used in the Ukraine. Those odds are particularly high. Higher because Ukraine has already had nuclear fallout. Chernobyl. Now they're fighting a nuclear power. But are still quite diminished, because who gains on use. Russia could gain an advantage to try and force surrender, and if Ukraine continues to attack it with Western armaments. But it will be that move that could backfire, popularity, support, allies, or even its own public, and in any regions joining Russia. No. I don't rule them out. But they're a game changer. A game changer that could also prompt Nato, to what extent remains, debatable, but they will call for all those international responses. It could perhaps lead to a truce. But internationally they're not recognising any break off regions. It will cause a public outcry, inciting.

So no. It will drag on for longer. Until they edge into becoming prompted, and it could be if Russia fails, losing ground, or if its military operations are substantially defeated, becoming further pressed into their usage by an aggressive Ukrainian army. Who let's face it, still aren't a match, despite them gaining more arms and equipment.

The odds are they haven't yet. Those odds remain lower percentage. However they gain as this conflict continues. It is against a nuclear power, that can use them, and will if pressed.

But you're providing a hypothetical. It isn't a fact. It's a theory. That Solar Flare. And to what extent. No idea. Except the Sun is coming. I mean it suggests the worst. But it is controversial. It's a theory. It hasn't been established or proved outside of adding speculation. Yes an asteroid could hit, and the Sun can nova. But it hasn't yet. Another 2 more weeks. In its scenario there is no provision for it. It happens. It will. They're as prepared for it today as they will be. They won't break protocol. It is speculation. Any preparation remains under protocol. It isn't inciting the public into a what if. There will continue to be its what if. It's the sun after all. It is suggesting an immediate cycle. Speculation. A concern perhaps. But will follow any protocol. There is no other preparation. You would be absurd to suggest 8 billion people hibernate underground until it could or might. They won't be saved in its erratically claimed event.

A debatable solar flare. Isn't a unclear war.

A tactical nuke I agree could be localised. It could be used in the Ukraine. Those odds are particularly high. Higher because Ukraine has already had nuclear fallout. Chernobyl. Now they're fighting a nuclear power. But are still quite diminished, because who gains on use. Russia could gain an advantage to try and force surrender, and if Ukraine continues to attack it with Western armaments. But it will be that move that could backfire, popularity, support, allies, or even its own public, and in any regions joining Russia. No. I don't rule them out. But they're a game changer. A game changer that could also prompt Nato, to what extent remains, debatable, but they will call for all those international responses. It could perhaps lead to a truce. But internationally they're not recognising any break off regions. It will cause a public outcry, inciting.

So no. It will drag on for longer. Until they edge into becoming prompted, and it could be if Russia fails, losing ground, or if its military operations are substantially defeated, becoming further pressed into their usage by an aggressive Ukrainian army. Who let's face it, still aren't a match, despite them gaining more arms and equipment.

The odds are they haven't yet. Those odds remain lower percentage. However they gain as this conflict continues. It is against a nuclear power, that can use them, and will if pressed.

But you're providing a hypothetical. It isn't a fact. It's a theory. That Solar Flare. And to what extent. No idea. Except the Sun is coming. I mean it suggests the worst. But it is controversial. It's a theory. It hasn't been established or proved outside of adding speculation. Yes an asteroid could hit, and the Sun can nova. But it hasn't yet. Another 2 more weeks. In its scenario there is no provision for it. It happens. It will. They're as prepared for it today as they will be. They won't break protocol. It is speculation. Any preparation remains under protocol. It isn't inciting the public into a what if. There will continue to be its what if. It's the sun after all. It is suggesting an immediate cycle. Speculation. A concern perhaps. But will follow any protocol. There is no other preparation. You would absurd to suggest 8 billion people hibernate underground until it could or might. They won't be saved in its erratically claimed event.

A debatable solar flare. Isn't a unclear war.

A tactical nuke I agree could be localised. It could be used in the Ukraine. Those odds are particularly high. Higher because Ukraine has already had nuclear fallout. Chernobyl. Now they're fighting a nuclear power. But are still quite diminished, because who gains on use. Russia could gain an advantage to try and force surrender, and if Ukraine continues to attack it with Western armaments. But it will be that move that could backfire, popularity, support, allies, or even its own public, and in any regions joining Russia. No. I don't rule them out. But they're a game changer. A game changer that could also prompt Nato, to what extent remains, debatable, but they will call for all those international responses. It could perhaps lead to a truce. But internationally they're not recognising any break off regions. It will cause a public outcry, inciting.

So no. It will drag on for longer. Until they edge into becoming prompted, and it could be if Russia fails, losing ground, or if its military operations are substantially defeated, becoming further pressed into their usage by an aggressive Ukrainian army. Who let's face it, still aren't a match, despite them gaining more arms and equipment.

The odds are they haven't yet. Those odds remain lower percentage. However they gain as this conflict continues. It is against a nuclear power, that can use them, and will if pressed.

But you're providing a hypothetical. It isn't a fact. It's a theory. That Solar Flare. And to what extent. No idea. Except the Sun is coming. I mean it suggests the worst. But it is controversial. It's a theory. It hasn't been established or proved outside of adding speculation. Yes an asteroid could hit, and the Sun can nova. But it hasn't yet. Another 2 more weeks

A debatable solar flare. Isn't a unclear war.

A tactical nuke I agree could be localised. It could be used in the Ukraine. Those odds are particularly high. Higher because Ukraine has already had nuclear fallout. Chernobyl. Now they're fighting a nuclear power. But are still quite diminished, because who gains on use. Russia could gain an advantage to try and force surrender, and if Ukraine continues to attack it with Western armaments. But it will be that move that could backfire, popularity, support, allies, or even its own public, and in any regions joining Russia. No. I don't rule them out. But they're a game changer. A game changer that could also prompt Nato, to what extent remains, debatable, but they will call for all those international responses. It could perhaps lead to a truce. But internationally they're not recognising any break off regions. It will cause a public outcry, inciting.

So no. It will drag on for longer. Until they edge into becoming prompted, and it could be if Russia fails, losing ground, or if its military operations are substantially defeated, becoming further pressed into their usage by an aggressive Ukrainian army. Who let's face it, still aren't a match, despite them gaining more arms and equipment.

The odds are they haven't yet. Those odds remain lower percentage. However they gain as this conflict continues. It is against a nuclear power, that can use them, and will if pressed.

But you're providing a hypothetical. It isn't a fact. It's a theory. That Solar Flare. And to what extent. No idea. Except the Sun is coming. I mean it suggests the worst. But it is controversial. It's a theory. It hasn't been established or proved outside of adding speculation.

A debatable solar flare. Isn't a unclear war.

A tactical nuke I agree could be localised. It could be used in the Ukraine. Those odds are particularly high. Higher because Ukraine has already had nuclear fallout. Chernobyl. Now they're fighting a nuclear power. But are still quite diminished, because who gains on use. Russia could gain an advantage to try and force surrender, and if Ukraine continues to attack it with Western armaments. But it will be that move that could backfire, popularity, support, allies, or even its own public, and in any regions joining Russia. No. I don't rule them out. But they're a game changer. A game changer that could also prompt Nato, to what extent remains, debatable, but they will call for all those international responses. It could perhaps lead to a truce. But internationally they're not recognising any break off regions. It will cause a public outcry, inciting.

So no. It will drag on for longer. Until they edge into becoming prompted, and it could be if Russia fails, losing ground, or if its military operations are substantially defeated, becoming further pressed into their usage by an aggressive Ukrainian army. Who let's face it, still aren't a match, despite them gaining more arms and equipment.

The odds are they haven't yet. Those odds remain lower percentage. However they gain as this conflict continues. It is against a nuclear power, that can use them, and will if pressed.