there are MORE people fighting the Bolsheviks than there are Bolsheviks

The many are fighting among themselves (reasoning) when consenting to want vs not want the suggestions (Bolshevism) of the few.

Stalin and Lenin

Which suggested idol destroyed more lives...Stalin; Lenin or pornstars? The genocide is a mere mouse-click away and it's consensual.

One in a billion, nameless

What if it's the names and the counting that is being suggested by the few to tempt each ONE of the many to ignore being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable)?

Nature doesn't brand anything; nor does it count anything. It simply moves forward; while suggested brands and counting tempt one to want to hold onto the motion instead of being the resistance (living) within motion (dying).

Full stop.

Has any death you've ever perceived brought living to a "full stop" or did the loss tempted you to ignore the coexisting growth? Growing within loss represents the status quo of life.

more people opposing

Opposing implies by choice (not want); which puts one into opposition with others (want). Both sides within conflict (want vs not want imbalance) ignore being choice within need/want balance.

LGBTQP++++

Put some color in your hair and a dildo in your pocket and get out there...does it feel like winning to be on the other side of the conflict? Why do both sides consent to the suggested "LGBTQP++++" and who's suggesting it?

start rejecting fiat money

One doesn't need to reject suggested values; one needs to resist the temptation of suggestion over perception. Only then can one comprehend being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).

Don't wanting what others suggest doesn't help one growing within what's needed. Fiction (suggested money) can only be devaluated by adaptation to reality (perceivable value); not be opposing fiction. If money has no value then one is fighting to destroy "nothing" of value...that mental state of ignorance keeping one engaged in physical conflicts is what's being ruthlessly exploited by the parasitic few, who suggest the ignorant many what to fight each other over.

You are not part of the many...one represents a partial (perceiving) of the whole (perceivable).

becoming one of the numbers

• NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun [Latin unus] - "one"

To be implies ONE (perceiving) of ONEness (perceivable). Suggested collectivism tempts one to ignore this for being "one of the many".

Sleight of hand: "Gooble Gobble...One of Us...We Accept Her". That's what the FREAKS do aka FREAK, verb (Hebrew; to divide.] - "change of place; turn of mind".

there are MORE people fighting the Bolsheviks than there are Bolsheviks

The many are fighting among themselves (reasoning) when consenting to want vs not want the suggestions (Bolshevism) of the few.

Stalin and Lenin

Which suggested idol destroyed more lives...Stalin; Lenin or pornstars? The genocide is a mere mouse-click away and it's consensual.

One in a billion, nameless

What if it's the names and the counting that is being suggested by the few to tempt each ONE of the many to ignore being ONE (perceiving) within ONEness (perceivable)?

Nature doesn't brand anything; nor does it count anything. It simply moves forward; while suggested brands and counting tempt one to want to hold onto the motion instead of being the resistance (living) within motion (dying).

Full stop.

Has any death you've ever perceived brought living to a "full stop" or did the loss tempted you to ignore the coexisting growth? Growing within loss represents the status quo of life.

more people opposing

Opposing implies by choice (not want); which puts one into opposition with others (want). Both sides within conflict (want vs not want imbalance) ignore being choice within need/want balance.

LGBTQP++++

Put some color in your hair and a dildo in your pocket and get out there...does it feel like winning to be on the other side of the conflict? Why do both sides consent to the suggested "LGBTQP++++" and who's suggesting it?

start rejecting fiat money

One doesn't need to reject suggested values; one needs to resist the temptation of suggestion over perception. Only then can one comprehend being evaluation (perceiving) within value (perceivable).

Don't wanting what others suggest doesn't help one growing within what's needed. Fiction (suggested money) can only be devaluated by adaptation to reality (perceivable value); not be opposing fiction. If money has no value then one is fighting to destroy "nothing" of value...that mental state of ignorance keeping one engaged in physical conflicts is what's being ruthlessly exploited by the parasitic few, who suggest the ignorant many what to fight each other over.

You are not part of the many...one represents a partial (perceiving) of the whole (perceivable).

becoming one of the numbers

• NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit" + U'NIT, noun [Latin unus] - "one"

To be implies ONE (perceiving) of ONEness (perceivable). Suggested collectivism tempts one ignore this for being "one of the many".

Sleight of hand: "Gooble Gobble...One of Us...We Accept Her". That's what the FREAKS do aka FREAK, verb (Hebrew; to divide.] - "change of place; turn of mind".