Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Romans had concrete because of the catacombs. The only location on the Planet. Despite of glass not being Roman and invented earlier.

The problem is the narrative after the reformation, where history was brutally rewritten into Rome invented everything. No prior recording and any other recording was either destroyed, or kept locked away by Rome. With the insertion of CE, BCE, it meant Rome are the modern keepers of the narrative. So they invented everything like concrete, iron, and Jesus, CE. Everything else before is otherwise monkeys, or has no valid recording. If it's not in Latin, it was in another language, and you better check the Latin first. Because it has to fit into the Roman dates of an established and inserted 5 thousand years previous. An assumption that there was nothing but the primate neanderthals, who suddenly out of the blue made the pyramids. Of course they had 5 thousand years of mashing rock's together. But forget all about them, Rome buried them, because there was no other civilised civilization, and that's because they didn't have Christ, or Iron, and definitely no concrete either.

Ironic, no but it's been that case. 5 thousand years BCE, forget almost completely about anything else, because they invented, inserting the stone age. How did they build those pyramids without Roman iron? They banged each other over the head, no, well they had bronze wheels, and it can be done if you bang a few more heads together with Roman iron providing the modern timeline where it recorded the stone age. But there's definitely no concrete in the stone age.

So many people and recordings have questioned this. But it's a case of where did civilised civilization begin. With Christ of course. Prior it's almost all of a strict 5 thousand previous. Where it needed some origin, like the wheel, the stones, and the monkeys inventing them. Any writing of course is Latin and Greek, otherwise it's more rock art, and begs a Latin inscription.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Romans had concrete because of the catacombs. The only location on the Planet. Despite of glass not being Roman and invented earlier.

The problem is the narrative after the reformation, where history was brutally rewritten into Rome invented everything. No prior recording and any other recording was either destroyed, or kept locked away by Rome. With the insertion of CE, BCE, it meant Rome are the modern keepers of the narrative. So they invented everything like concrete, iron, and Jesus, CE. Everything else before is otherwise monkeys, or has no valid recording. If it's not in Latin, it was in another language, and you better check the Latin first. Because it has to fit into the Roman dates of an established and inserted 5 thousand years previous. An assumption that there was nothing but the primate neanderthals, who suddenly out of the blue made the pyramids. Of course they had 5 thousand years of mashing rock's together. But forget all about them, Rome buried them, because there was no other civilised civilization, and that's because they didn't have Christ, or Iron, and definitely no concrete either.

Ironic, no but it's been that case. 5 thousand years BCE, forget almost completely about anything else, because they invented, inserting the stone age. How did they build those pyramids without Roman iron? They banged each other over the head, no, well they had bronze wheels, and it can be done if you bang a few more heads together with Roman iron providing the modern timeline where it recorded the stone age. But there's definitely no concrete in the stone age.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Romans had concrete because of the catacombs. The only location on the Planet. Despite of glass not being Roman and invented earlier.

The problem is the narrative after the reformation, where history was brutally rewritten into Rome invented everything. No prior recording and any other recording was either destroyed, or kept locked away by Rome. With the insertion of CE, BCE, it meant Rome are the modern keepers of the narrative. So they invented everything like concrete, iron, and Jesus, CE. Everything else before is otherwise monkeys, or has no valid recording. If it's s not in Latin, it was in another language, and you better check the Latin first. Because it has to fit into the Roman dates of an established and inserted 5 thousand years previous. An assumption that there was nothing but the primate neanderthals, who suddenly out of the blue made the pyramids. Of course they had 5 thousand years of mashing rock's together. But forget all about them, Rome buried them, because there was no other civilised civilization, and that's because they didn't have Christ, or Iron, and definitely no concrete either.

Ironic, no but it's been that case. 5 thousand years BCE, forget almost completely about anything else, because they invented, inserting the stone age. How did they build those pyramids without Roman iron? They banged each other over the head, no, well they had bronze wheels, and it can be done if you bang a few more heads together with Roman iron providing the modern timeline where it recorded the stone age. But there's definitely no concrete in the stone age.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

Romans had concrete because of the catacombs. The only location on the Planet. Despite of glass not being Roman and invented earlier.

The problem is the narrative after the reformation, where history was brutally rewritten into Rome invented everything. No prior recording and any other recording was either destroyed, or kept locked away by Rome. With the insertion of CE, BCE, it meant Rome are the modern keepers of the narrative. So they invented everything like concrete, iron and Jesus, CE. Everything else before is otherwise monkeys, or has no valid recording, it's not Latin, it was in another language you better check the latin first. Because it has to fit into the Roman dates of an established and inserted 5 thousand years previous. An assumption that there was nothing but the primate neanderthals, who suddenly out of the blue made the pyramids. Of course they had 5 thousand years of mashing rock's together. But forget all about them, Rome buried them, because there was no other civilised civilization, and that's because they didn't have Christ or Iron and definitely no concrete either.

Ironic, no but it's been that case. 5 thousand years BCE, forget almost completely about anything else, because they inserted the stone age. How did they build those pyramids without Roman iron? They banged each other over the head, no, well they had bronze wheels, and it can be done if you bang a few more heads together with Roman Iron providing the modern timeline where it recorded the stone age. But there's no concrete in the stone age.

2 years ago
1 score