All suggested math is based on 0 aka an affixed state to count from; which tempts those counting to ignore being the 1 (choice) within ALL (balance). Math tempts ONE to seek solutions to suggested problems; while ignoring that being moved from inception towards death represents the solution and that each ONE within represents the resistance to being solved aka transmuted back to base.

Mistaken on all fronts.

Math was used by many archaic cultures which did NOT use a zero. It is based on knowledge of objects, one object plus another and so on... this does not require the idea of zero despite it following logically.

Differentials, such as the one I wrote, compare change, zero is not fundamental.

(Have fun with mostly Greek roots instead of Latin ones this time, I noticed you skipped 'etymology' and only mention the Latin root words...)

All suggested math is based on 0 aka an affixed state to count from; which tempts those counting to ignore being the 1 (choice) within ALL (balance). Math tempts ONE to seek solutions to suggested problems; while ignoring that being moved from inception towards death represents the solution and that each ONE within represents the resistance to being solved aka transmuted back to base.

Mistaken on all fronts.

Math was used by many archaic cultures which did NOT use a zero. It is based on knowledge of objects, one object plus another and so on... this does not require the idea of zero despite it following logically.

Differentials, such as the one I wrote, compare change, zero is not fundamental.

(Have fun with mostly Greek roots instead of Latin ones this time.)