Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

No. What is preventing all out war. Currently. Nukes are.

Not speculation.

Of course there is a mad little AI embedding itself for profit. Playing both sides off. While investors reap the rewards of the conflicts generated.

It would be much easier to destroy a military conventionally otherwise. Suggesting they don't exist, is ridiculous. Because war is easier. It was against Saddam, and many others. You don't even need to win the war by holding on to Iraq. You just need to wipe out its military industrial complex. Then the opponent destroys themself, or install a favorable government.

So tell me genius why they haven't gone to war against those sides today. Look at them. Why hasn't Nato rolled in. It would lead to a bigger war, yes. But with no nukes, an easier win. Well, because they're both profiting off it. Yes undoubtedly. But it's because nukes are preventing it.

Stop shit posting this crap. Every Zombie would be at. Everywhere overnight. They'd rush America, they are, but through bullshit immigration. Overnight how many would give them a gigantic finger if there was no nukes. Look at Israel. It would be World War Z. What prevents it. Not Israel. Nukes do.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

No. What is preventing all out war. Currently. Nukes are.

Not speculation.

Of course there is a mad little AI embedding itself for profit. Playing both sides off. While investors reap the rewards of the conflicts generated.

It would be much easier to destroy a military conventionally otherwise. Suggesting they don't exist, is ridiculous. Because war is easier. It was against Sadam, and many others. You don't even need to win the war by holding on to Iraq. You just need to wipe out its military industrial complex. Then the opponent destroys themself, or install a favorable government.

So tell me genius why they haven't gone to war against those sides today. Look at them. Why hasn't Nato rolled in. It would lead to a bigger war, yes. But with no nukes, an easier win. Well, because they're both profiting off it. Yes undoubtedly. But it's because nukes are preventing it.

Stop shit posting this crap. Every Zombie would be at. Everywhere overnight. They'd rush America, they are, but through bullshit immigration. Overnight how many would give them a gigantic finger if there was no nukes. Look at Israel. It would be World War Z. What prevents it. Not Israel. Nukes do.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

No. What is preventing all out war. Currently. Nukes are.

Not speculation.

Of course there is a mad little AI embedding itself for profit. Playing both sides off. While investors reap the rewards of the conflicts generated.

It would be much easier to destroy a military conventionally otherwise. Suggesting they don't exist, is ridiculous. Because war is easier. It was against Sadam, and many others. You don't even need to win the war by holding on to Iraq. You just need to wipe out its military industrial complex. Then the opponent destroys themself, or install a favorable government.

So tell me genius why they haven't gone to war against those sides today. Look at them. Why hasn't Nato rolled in. Because they're both profiting off it. Yes undoubtedly. But it's because nukes are preventing it.

3 years ago
1 score