I'm telling about technical details and underlying physics, you link politicians bollocks, marketing shit and propaganda. Since when you believe a single word from UK defence minister? :):):)
"GPS receiver found taped to dash in crushed plane". :) Russian scotch tape is superior! Withstand plane crashes. Just like that famous arab passports at 911. Arabs make superior passports, Russians make superior sticking tape. What else do you have in your barrel with MSM bullshit?
The barrel bombs use the analog circuits. The shells use the analog circuits. The missile today not Russian use the precision guidance. The Neptune and stuff.
And the results clearly show that simple and cheap as fuck analog weapons are superior over that overcomplicated western crap, that is easily destroyed by high-precision "barrel bombs" even before it gets to the battlefield. Hit count for western weaponry is surprisingly miserable. Single very old rusty ship with how many Neptunes fired? Does it worth it?
It does not matter how complicated your weapon is, how much it cost and how many hig-tech components it use. Only thing that matter for warfare is a result. And results for western warfare is miserable. I even think that West now just don't want to sell its best weapons to Ukraine under the fear that real battlefield will show that they are nearly useless, and West will not able to sell that overpriced crap anymore. On the other side, I see a growing demand for that simple Russian weapons. India and Iran already trying to order that "dumb high-precision barrel rockets" in huge amounts.
The previous MIT quantum processor. A step up from both basic Dwave. But even on the Wiki China has them. But remind me what you said prior. They didn't exists
Yep. they don't exist. Just like thermonuclear power stations. You could cite a ton of tokamaks, stellarators and school mock-ups, but that does not mean that there exists thermonuclear power stations.
Are you really so uneducated and don't even try to use critical thinking?
I'm telling about technical details and underlying physics, you link politicians bollocks, marketing shit and propaganda. Since when you believe a single word from UK defence minister? :):):)
The barrel bombs use the analog circuits. The shells use the analog circuits. The missile today not Russian use the precision guidance. The Neptune and stuff.
And the results clearly show that simple and cheap as fuck analog weapons are superior over that overcomplicated western crap, that is easily destroyed by high-precision "barrel bombs" even before it gets to the battlefield. Hit count for western weaponry is surprisingly miserable. Single very old rusty ship with how many Neptunes fired? Does it worth it?
It does not matter how complicated your weapon is, how much it cost and how many hig-tech components it use. Only thing that matter for warfare is a result. And results for western warfare is miserable. I even think that West now just don't want to sell its best weapons to Ukraine under the fear that real battlefield will show that they are nearly useless, and West will not able to sell that overpriced crap anymore. On the other side, I see a growing demand for that simple Russian weapons. India and Iran already trying to order that "dumb high-precision barrel rockets" in huge amounts.
The previous MIT quantum processor. A step up from both basic Dwave. But even on the Wiki China has them. But remind me what you said prior. They didn't exists
Yep. they don't exist. Just like thermonuclear power stations. You could cite a ton of tokamaks, stellarators and school mock-ups, but that does not mean that there exists thermonuclear power stations.
Are you really so uneducated and don't even try to use critical thinking?