Funny how in the past we never saw this many MAJOR fires at food processing plants. Yes there were some fires, but not plants burning down and not one right after another right after another. Furthermore, once one plant burns, the others do take extra care not to have their own accidents. So there should be fewer fires after incidents, but we are seeing more. And what counts is how many large plants, not smaller facilities that produce less. Four major plant fires per month since start of year is a bit unlikely to be mere coincidence.
Despite what the 20-day old troll in this thread says, using biased argument, there may be 30,000 plants but what counts is how many MAJOR large plants are catching fire. The troll cited data only to 2019 and nothing for last year and this year showing trends. Obviously if there is an arson campaign, we should look at data showing whether fires increased last and this year.
The Reuters article cites Snopes as an authority - I think that tells you how much the controlled media can be trusted.
Funny how it all happens in synchrony with gas prices going up, cargo transport being blocked leading to empty market shelves, and actual resistance by Congress against doing a single thing to make it better. And in synchrony with the UN warning of food shortages.
Funny how in the past we never saw this many MAJOR fires at food processing plants. Yes there were some fires, but not plants burning down and not one right after another right after another. Furthermore, once one plant burns, the others do take extra care not to have their own accidents. So there should be fewer fires after incidents, but we are seeing more. And what counts is how many large plants, not smaller facilities that produce less. Four major plant fires per month since start of year is a bit unlikely to be mere coincidence.
Despite what the 20-day old troll in this thread says, using biased argument, there may be 30,000 plants but what counts is how many MAJOR large plants are catching fire. The troll cited data only to 2019 and nothing for last year and this year showing trends. Obviously if there is an arson campaign, we should look at data showing whether fires increased last and this year.
The Reuters article cites Snopes as an authority - I think that tells you how the controlled media can be trusted.
Funny how it all happens in synchrony with gas prices going up, cargo transport being blocked leading to empty market shelves, and actual resistance by Congress against doing a single thing to make it better. And in synchrony with the UN warning of food shortages.
Funny how in the past we never saw this many MAJOR fires at food processing plants. Yes there were some fires, but not plants burning down and not one right after another right after another. Furthermore, once one plant burns, the others do take extra care not to have their own accidents. So there should be fewer fires after incidents, but we are seeing more. And what counts is how many large plants, not smaller facilities that produce less. Four major plant fires per month since start of year is a bit unlikely to be mere coincidence.
Despite what the 20-day old troll in this thread says, using biased argument, there may be 30,000 plants but what counts is how many MAJOR large plants are catching fire. The troll cited data only to 2019 and nothing for last year and this year showing trends. Obviously if there is an arson campaign, we should look at data showing whether fires increased last and this year.
The Reuters article cites Snopes as an authority - I think that tells you how the controlled media can be trusted.
Funny how it all happens in synchrony with gas prices going up, cargo transport being blocked leadign to empty market shelves, and actual resistance by Congress against doing a single thing to make it better. And in synchrony with the UN warning of food shortages.
Funny how in the past we never saw this many MAJOR fires at food processing plants. Yes there were some fires, but not plants burning down and not one right after another right after another. Furthermore, once one plant burns, the others do take extra care not to have their own accidents. So there should be fewer fires after incidents, but we are seeign more. And what counts is how many large plants, not smaller facilities that produce less.
Despite what the 20-day old troll in this thread says, using biased argument, there may be 30,000 plants but what counts is how many MAJOR large plants are catching fire. The troll cited data only to 2019 and nothing for last year and this year showing trends. Obviously if there is an arson campaign, we should look at data showing whether fires increased last and this year.
The Reuters article cites Snopes as an authority - I think that tells you how the controlled media can be trusted.
Funny how it all happens in synchrony with gas prices going up, cargo transport being blocked and actual resistance by Congress against doing a single thing to make it better.