I am not sure about that. In fact I am sure that's wrong, the younger dryas, prior supervolcano, at least twice in the last 100,000 years. It was debated recently in fact. How many years between violent geology or impact. Not sure what they concluded or if it was correct, but it's much less than 80k.

Romans 5th generation. No they usurped the current paradigm as in all dating has been done because of them. Where they're responsible for a point of reference, setting the past back to around 5000 years prior to Christ. It was never like this until the reformation. Where it was the work of two leading historians, giving us AD, and BC and the dumb ages of stone, bronze, and iron.

Stonehenge is a modern fraud. I simply used the Romans to suggest of its impossible occurrence. They destroyed all other British druid sites brutally.

I have up voted your attempt, but it's lacking some knowledge.

I am not sure about that. In fact I am sure that's wrong, the younger dryas, prior supervolcano, at least twice in the last 100,000 years.

Romans 5th generation. No they usurped the current paradigm as in all dating has been done because of them. Where they're responsible for a point of reference, setting the past back to around 5000 years prior to Christ. It was never like this until the reformation. Where it was the work of two leading historians, giving us AD, and BC and the dumb ages of stone, bronze, and iron.

Stonehenge is a modern fraud. I simply used the Romans to suggest of its impossible occurrence. They destroyed all other British druid sites brutally.

I have up voted your attempt, but it's lacking some knowledge.