Good question!!
I actually read several diaries to try to understand the jewish mindset and why things went the way it did.
I can sum it up with 2 things:
-They made mistakes
-They couldn't get away easily with it
The Boers had no other Boers to be pissed off at such action, the Native American were not quite united, but the Palestinians are part of a larger Arab Ethnicity or culture, while it's true all Arab leaders and regimes are traitors, the jews still can't get away with mass relocation, relatively recently the jews had to fight true nationalist leader such as Jamal Abd Al Nasser, even people like Sadam were a pain. If it was just the Palestinians against the jews they would have easily moved them.
Just a reminder, the Palestinians actually refused and continue to refuse relocation, they would rather die than move. Palestinians in Jerusalem are offered insane amounts of money to sell their homes but they do not do it!!
Palestinians in Jerusalem are offered American passports and millions just to leave but they refuse. I know it's hard to believe but that's the case. Some of them do actually accept the offers but they always have to try and pretend that they didn't sell their homes, if they are found out, any other Palestinian would kill them for it.
Through a combination of reasons the jews were unsuccessful in relocating the Palestinians, take for example the deep state in Jordan. They didn't want more Palestinians because it would turn Jordan into an official Palestinian state and the nomadic tribes in charge of it would lose their power. Same thing with Lebanon the Christians don't want any more Muslims.
Egypt had a national system at one point which would refuse such a thing, back in the 50s and 60s there was a strong national Arab pride that was not only dangerous for israelis but to the international oligarchy., under Al-Sisi it may happen and I think they are planning it, maybe Mubarak didn't accept it and he was toppled because of it.
Golda Meir actually regretted not killing all the Palestinians left in areas occupied in 1948, they only left very few Palestinians alive but they proved to be problematic later on. In 1967 the Palestinians have learned their lesson from 1948 and were willing to die than leave their homes, town municipalities in areas like Nablus refused to let anyone leave to the east bank (Jordan) and thus stood against mass migration, and the jews didn't want to commit mass massacres because they must have believed it would cause them more serious issues down the road (It was the days of Nasser back then, a whole different world)
Good question!!
I actually read several diaries to try to understand the jewish mindset and why things went the way it did.
I can sum it up with 2 things:
-They made mistakes
-They couldn't get away easily with it
The Boers had no other Boers to be pissed off at such action, the Native American were not quite united, but the Palestinians are part of a larger Arab Ethnicity or culture, while it's true all Arab leaders and regimes are traitors, the jews still can't get away with mass relocation, relatively recently the jews had to fight true nationalist leader such as Jamal Abd Al Nasser, even people like Sadam were a pain. If it was just the Palestinians against the jews they would have easily moved them.
Just a reminder, the Palestinians actually refused and continue to refuse relocation, they would rather die than move. Palestinians in Jerusalem are offered insane amounts of money to sell their homes but they do not do it!!
Palestinians in Jerusalem are offered American passports and millions just to leave but they refuse. I know it's hard to believe but that's the case. Some of them do actually accept the offers but they always have to try and pretend that they didn't sell their homes, if they are found out, any other Palestinian would kill them for it.
Through a combination of reasons the jews were unsuccessful in relocating the Palestinians, take for example the deep state in Jordan. They didn't want more Palestinians because it would turn Jordan into an official Palestinian state and the nomadic tribes in charge of it would lose their power. Same thing with Lebanon the Christians don't want any more Muslims.
Egypt had a national system at one point which would refuse such a thing, back in the 50s and 60s there was a strong national Arab pride that was not only dangerous for israelis but to the international oligarchy., under Al-Sisi it may happen and I think they are planning it, maybe Mubarak didn't accept it and he was toppled because of it.
Golda Meir actually regretted not killing all the Palestinians left in areas occupied in 1948, they only left very Palestinians alive but they proved to be problematic later on. In 1967 the Palestinians have learned their lesson from 1948 and were willing to die than leave their homes, town municipalities in areas like Nablus refused to let anyone leave to the east bank (Jordan) and thus stood against mass migration, and the jews didn't want to commit mass massacres because they must have believed it would cause them more serious issues down the road (It was the days of Nasser back then, a whole different world)
Good question!!
I actually read several diaries to try to understand the jewish mindset and why things went the way it did.
I can sum it up with 2 things:
-They made mistakes
-They couldn't get away easily with it
The Boers had no other Boers to be pissed off at such action, the Native American were not quite united, but the Palestinians are part of a larger Arab Ethnicity or culture, while it's true all Arab leaders and regimes are traitors, the jews still can't get away with mass relocation, relatively recently the jews had to fight true nationalist leader such as Jamal Abd Al Nasser, even people like Sadam were a pain. If it was just the Palestinians against the jews they would have easily moved them.
Just a reminder, the Palestinians actually refused and continue to refuse relocation, they would rather die than move. Palestinians in Jerusalem are offered insane amounts of money to sell their homes but they do not do it!!
Palestinians in Jerusalem are offered American passports and millions just to leave but they refuse. I know it's hard to believe but that's the case. Some of them do actually accept the offers but they always have to try and pretend that they didn't sell their homes, if they are found out, any other Palestinian would kill them for it.
Through a combination of reasons the jews were unsuccessful in relocating the Palestinians, take for example the deep state in Jordan. They didn't want more Palestinians because it would turn Jordan into an official Palestinian state and the nomadic tribes in charge of it would lose their power. Same thing with Lebanon the Christians don't want any more Muslims.
Egypt had a national system at one point which would refuse such a thing, back in the 50s and 60s there was a strong national Arab pride that was not only dangerous for israelis but to the international oligarchy., under Al-Sisi it may happen and I think they are planning it, maybe Mubarak didn't accept it and he was toppled because of it.
Gold Meir actually regretted not killing all the Palestinians left in areas occupied in 1948, they only left very Palestinians alive but they proved to be problematic later on. In 1967 the Palestinians have learned their lesson from 1948 and were willing to die than leave their homes, town municipalities in areas like Nablus refused to let anyone leave to the east bank (Jordan) and thus stood against mass migration, and the jews didn't want to commit mass massacres because they must have believed it would cause them more serious issues down the road (It was the days of Nasser back then, a whole different world)
Good question!!
I actually read several diaries to try to understand the jewish mindset and why things went the way it did.
I can sum it up with 2 things:
-They made mistakes
-They couldn't get away easily with it
The Boers had no other Boers to be pissed off at such action, the Native American were not quite united, but the Palestinians are part of a larger Arab Ethnicity or culture, while it's true all Arab leaders and regimes are traitors, the jews still can't get away with mass relocation, relatively recently the jews had to fight true nationalist leader such as Jamal Abd Al Nasser, even people like Sadam were a pain. If it was just the Palestinians against the jews they would have easily moved them.
Just a reminder, the Palestinians actually refused and continue to refuse relocation, they would rather die than move. Palestinians in Jerusalem are offered insane amounts of money to sell their homes but they do not do it!!
Palestinians in Jerusalem are offered American passports and millions just to leave but they refuse. I know it's hard to believe but that's the case. Some of them do actually accept the offers but they always have to try and pretend that they didn't sell their homes, if they are found out, any other Palestinian would kill them for it.
Through a combination of reasons the jews were unsuccessful in relocating the Palestinians, take for example the deep state in Jordan. They didn't want more Palestinians because it would turn Jordan into an official Palestinian state and the nomadic tribes in charge of it would lose their power. Same thing with Lebanon the Christians don't want any more Muslims.
Egypt had a national system at one point which would refuse such a thing, back in the 50s and 60s there was a strong national Arab pride that was not only dangerous for israelis but to the international oligarchy., under Al-Sisi it may happen and I think they are planning it, maybe Mubarak didn't accept it and he was toppled.
Gold Meir actually regretted not killing all the Palestinians left in areas occupied in 1948, they only left very Palestinians alive but they proved to be problematic later on. In 1967 the Palestinians have learned their lesson from 1948 and were willing to die than leave their homes, town municipalities in areas like Nablus refused to let anyone leave to the east bank (Jordan) and thus stood against mass migration, and the jews didn't want to commit mass massacres because they must have believed it would cause them more serious issues down the road (It was the days of Nasser back then, a whole different world)