Zelenskyy hasn't been operating from the Ukraine for quite some time. It definitely wasn't Kiev. Meanwhile the British media have been lying at every opportunity. A combination of both.
But it's the direct implication caused by this. There are no hidden meanings. It means direct involvement sooner. Very little margin outside of it. Him being there doesn't matter what Russia does. It means the British army turning up. It leaves no room for debate. He does it anyway, outside of approval. Where afterwards it might go through Parliament on the conclusion he's a hero, why aren't any troops. See how easy that was to force support. It's the only strategy being used here. Churchill's playbook. Nevermind how he got there. He didn't. But it's a fact. If he is, why aren't the army he just used.
So responsible. Where it would've taken all those military planes and soldiers securing him passage. Did they? No, but it doesn't matter. Not even on marginal odds, has he gone over there to Kiev. But the media have created the opinion that he has. No sooner, obviously it might take some more or less propaganda, another warcrime, or not, or whatever, and it will go through parliament. They have his approval, he's done it.
The problem is nobody is honest. There is no debate outside of trolls on social media who attack anybody smart enough to call out the lies. Then it just bans you for questioning them.
Zelenskyy hasn't been operating from the Ukraine for quite some time. It definitely wasn't Kiev. Meanwhile the British media have been lying at every opportunity. A combination of both.
But it's the direct implication caused by this. There are no hidden meanings. It means direct involvement sooner. Very little margin outside of it. Him being there doesn't matter what Russia does. It means the British army turning up. It leaves no room for debate. He does it anyway, outside of approval. Where afterwards it might go through Parliament on the conclusion he's a hero, why aren't any troops. See how easy that was to force support. It's the only strategy being used here. Churchill's playbook. Nevermind how he got there. He didn't. But it's a fact. If he is, why aren't the army he just used.
So responsible. Where it would've taken all those military planes and soldiers securing him passage. Did they? No, but it doesn't matter. Not even on marginal odds, has he gone over there. But the media have created the opinion that he has. No sooner, obviously it might take some more or less propaganda, another warcrime, or not, or whatever, and it will go through parliament. They have his approval, he's done it.
The problem is nobody is honest. There is no debate outside of trolls on social media who attack anybody smart enough to call out the lies. Then it just bans you for questioning them.
Zelenskyy hasn't been operating from the Ukraine for quite some time. Meanwhile the British media have been lying at every opportunity. A combination of both.
But it's the direct implication caused by this. There are no hidden meanings. It means direct involvement sooner. Very little margin outside of it. Him being there doesn't matter what Russia does. It means the British army turning up. It leaves no room for debate. He does it anyway, outside of approval. Where afterwards it might go through Parliament on the conclusion he's a hero, why aren't any troops. See how easy that was to force support. It's the only strategy being used here. Churchill's playbook. Nevermind how he got there. He didn't. But it's a fact. If he is, why aren't the army he just used.
So responsible. Where it would've taken all those military planes and soldiers securing him passage. Did they? No, but it doesn't matter. Not even on marginal odds, has he gone over there. But the media have created the opinion that he has. No sooner, obviously it might take some more or less propaganda, another warcrime, or not, or whatever, and it will go through parliament. They have his approval, he's done it.
The problem is nobody is honest. There is no debate outside of trolls on social media who attack anybody smart enough to call out the lies. Then it just bans you for questioning them.
Zelenskyy hasn't been operating from the Ukraine for quite some time. Meanwhile the British media have been lying at every opportunity. A combination of both.
But it's the direct implication caused by this. There are no hidden meanings. It means direct involvement sooner. Very little margin outside of it. Him being there doesn't matter what Russia does. It means the British army turning up. It leaves no room for debate. He does it anyway, outside of approval. Where afterwards it might go through Parliament on the conclusion he's a hero, why aren't any troops. See how easy that was to force support. It's the only strategy being used here. Churchill's playbook. Nevermind how he got there. He didn't. But it's a fact. If he is, why aren't the army he just used.
So responsible. Where it would've taken all those military planes and soldiers securing him passage. Did they? No, but it doesn't matter. Not even on marginal odds, has he gone over there. But the media have created the opinion that he has. No sooner, obviously it might take some more or less propaganda, another warcrime, or not, or whatever, and it will go through parliament. They have his approval, he's done it.
The problem is nobody is honest. There is no debate outside of trolls on social media who attack anybody smart enough to call out the lies. Then it just bans you for questioning them.
Zelenskyy hasn't been operating from the Ukraine for quite some time. Meanwhile the British media have been lying at every opportunity. A combination of both.
But it's the direct implication caused by this. There are no hidden meanings. It means direct involvement sooner. Very little margin outside of it. Him being there doesn't matter what Russia does. It means the British army turning up. It leaves no room for debate. He does it anyway, outside of approval. Where afterwards it might go through Parliament on the conclusion he's a hero, why aren't any troops. See how easy that was to force support. It's the only strategy being used here. Churchill's playbook. Nevermind how he got there. He didn't. But it's a fact. If he is, why aren't the army he just used.
So responsible. Where it would've taken all those military planes and soldiers securing him passage. Did they? No, but it doesn't matter. Not even on marginal odds, has he gone over there. But the media have created the opinion that he has. No sooner, obviously it might take some more or less propaganda, another warcrime, or not or whatever, and it will go through parliament. They have his approval, he's done it.
The problem is nobody is honest. There is no debate outside of trolls on social media who attack anybody smart enough to call out the lies. Then it just bans you for questioning them.
Zelenskyy hasn't been operating from the Ukraine for quite some time. Meanwhile the British media have been lying at every opportunity. A combination of both.
But it's the direct implication caused by this. There are no hidden meanings. It means direct involvement sooner. Very little margin outside of it. Him being there doesn't matter what Russia does. It means the British army turning up. It leaves no room for debate. He does it anyway, outside of approval. Where afterwards it might go through Parliament on the conclusion he's a hero, why aren't any troops. See how easy that was to force support. It's the only strategy being used here. Churchill's playbook. Nevermind how he got there. He didn't. But it's a fact. If he is, why aren't the army he just used.
So responsible. Where it would've taken all those military planes and soldiers securing him passage. Did they? No, but it doesn't matter. Not even on marginal odds, has he gone over there. But the media have created the opinion that he has. No sooner, obviously it might take some more or less propaganda, and it will go through parliament. They have his approval, he's done it.
The problem is nobody is honest. There is no debate outside of trolls on social media who attack anybody smart enough to call out the lies. Then it just bans you for questioning them.
Zelenskyy hasn't been operating from the Ukraine for quite some time. Meanwhile the British media have been lying at every opportunity. A combination of both.
But it's the direct implication caused by this. There are no hidden meanings. It means direct involvement sooner. Very little margin outside of it. Him being there doesn't matter what Russia does. It means the British army turning up. It leaves no room for debate. He does it anyway, outside of approval. Where afterwards it might go through Parliament on the conclusion he's a hero, why aren't any troops. See how easy that was to force support. It's the only strategy being used here. Churchill's playbook. Nevermind how he got there. He didn't. But it's a fact. If he is, why aren't the army he just used.
So responsible. Where it would've taken all those military planes and soldiers securing him passage. Did they? No, but it doesn't matter. Not even on marginal odds, has he gone over there. But the media have created that opinion he has. No sooner obviously it might take some more or less propaganda, and it will go through parliament. They have his approval, he's done it.
The problem is nobody is honest. There is no debate outside of trolls on social media who attack anybody smart enough to call out the lies. Then it just bans you for questioning them.
Zelenskyy hasn't been operating from the Ukraine for quite some time. Meanwhile the British media have been lying at every opportunity. A combination of both.
But it's the direct implication caused by this. There are no hidden meanings. It means direct involvement sooner. Very little margin outside of it. Him being there doesn't matter what Russia does. It means the British army turning up. It leaves no room for debate. He does it anyway, outside of approval. Where afterwards it might go through Parliament on the conclusion he's a hero, why aren't any troops. See how easy that was to force support. It's the only strategy being used here. Churchill's playbook. Nevermind how he got there. He didn't. But it's a fact. If he is, why aren't the army he just used.
So responsible. Where it would've taken all those military planes and soldiers securing him passage. Did they? No, but it doesn't matter. Not even on marginal odds, has he gone over there. But the media have created that opinion he has. No sooner obviously it might take some more or less propaganda, and it will go through parliament. They had his approval, he's done it.
The problem is nobody is honest. There is no debate outside of trolls on social media who attack anybody smart enough to call out the lies. Then it just bans you for questioning them.