Not hard to guess when it is only number or letter off, for a 6-7 letter/number sequence, from another batch (with many adverse events reported).
At least two different groups digging into the VAERS data, looking into the "bad batch" possibility, came to this same conclusion.
Alternatively, flip it on it's head ... do you really believe that ~80% of batches, of some unknown number of doses each (thought to be in the 1000's, based on the way they manufacture/package/label similar medical products), have ONLY one or two adverse events (jab injuries) each?
That doesn't seem to match what we have seen with the "enhanced" amount of COVID cases for the jabbed, the jab injuries, etc.., because that would basically imply that ~80% of vaccines were super low dose or entire placebo.
Not hard to guess when it is only number or letter off, for a 6-7 letter/number sequence, from another batch (with many adverse events reported).
At least two different groups digging into the VAERS data, looking into the "bad batch" possibility, came to this same conclusion.
Alternatively, flip it on it's head ... do you really believe that ~80% of batches, of some unknown number of doses each (thought to be in the 1000's, based on the way they manufacture/package/label similar medical products), have ONLY one or two adverse events (jab injuries) each?
That doesn't match what we have seen with the "enhanced" amount of COVID cases for the jabbed, the jab injuries, etc.., because that would basically imply that ~80% of vaccines were super low dose or entire placebo.
Not hard to guess when it is only number or letter off, for a 6-7 letter/number sequence, from another batch (with many adverse events reported).
At least two different groups digging into the VAERS data, looking into the "bad batch" possibility, came to this same conclusion.
Alternatively, flip it on it's head ... do you really believe that ~80% of batches, of some unknown number of doses each (thought to be in the 1000's, based on the way they manufacture/package/label similar medical products), have ONLY one or two adverse events (jab injuries) each?
Not hard to guess when it is only number or letter off, for a 6-7 letter/number sequence, from another batch (with many adverse events reported).
At least two different groups digging into the VAERS data, looking into the "bad batch" possibility, came to this same conclusion.