IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.

Needless to say there are huge gaps in IQ. An easier assumption is that neither fairs well in contrary environments, not without adopting more than IQ.

Please test it, put Einstein in the jungle, now put a moron from the jungle, back into that jungle. What went wrong. IQ obviously.

The debate gains greater traction of what has shaped since an evolutionary model, how any civilizations have advanced around it. Tired debates based on the assumptions of provided literacy.

Ultimately who cares?

IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.

Needless to say there are huge gaps in IQ. An easier assumption is that neither fairs well in contrary environments, not without adopting more than IQ.

Please test it, put Einstein in the jungle, now put a moron from the jungle, back into that jungle. What went wrong. IQ obviously.