No because of the latest battlefield tactics.

Many immediate positions were overrun on the field where they clashed to defend the border advances, and breakout from former separatist regions, and the Crimea. Some are still in place across the country, and largely still intact in others, perhaps across the West, but in the places where they immediately clashed on the field and in the air and sea. Like Chernobyl and a few ports. Kyvi airport has changed hands a few times and repelled advances. Like Kharkiv and others.

The tactics have changed into Urban retreat, and defense when fighting far superior numbers and a better equipped force, where fighting has been at its thickest. Supposedly taking longer for Russia to advance and indeed capture, as many cities are still in conflict. However they would be anyway as Urban centers. Like dated castles under seige took time to seige.

I am not picking sides. But that type of tactic has adapted on the field in modern warfare since places like Syria and Iraq.

But you can imagine cities using dead zones, lining roads with IEDs, and using so much of their environment for cover, and advantage, and also having hidden access across them from sewers, or metros, etc, and being incredibly dug in. While also using drones and snipers and even jamming, etc.

No different tactics. A tactic Russia itself knows and has used in WW2.

Stop down voting me. What did I ever do except argue a perspective? Discuss it except I am not very wrong.

No because of the latest battlefield tactics.

Many immediate positions were overrun on the field where they clashed to defend the border advances, and breakout from former separatist regions, and the Crimea. Some are still in place across the country, and largely still intact in others, perhaps across the West, but in the places where they immediately clashed on the field and in the air and sea. Like Chernobyl and a few ports. Kyvi airport has changed hands a few times and repelled advances. Like Kharkiv and others.

The tactics have changed into Urban retreat, and defense when fighting far superior numbers and a better equipped force, where fighting has been at its thickest. Supposedly taking longer for Russia to advance and indeed capture, as many cities are still in conflict. However they would be anyway as Urban centers. Like dated castles under seige took time to seige.

I am not picking sides. But that type of tactic has adapted on the field in modern warfare since places like Syria and Iraq.

But you can imagine cities using dead zones, lining roads with IEDs, and using so much of their environment for cover, and advantage, and also having hidden access across them from sewers, or metros, etc, and being incredibly dug in. While also using drones and snipers etc.

No different tactics. A tactic Russia itself knows and has used in WW2.

Stop down voting me. What did I ever do except argue a perspective? Discuss it except I am not very wrong.

No because of the latest battlefield tactics.

Many immediate positions were overrun on the field where they clashed to defend the border advances, and breakout from former separatist regions, and the Crimea. Some are still in place across the country, and largely still intact in others, perhaps across the West, but in the places where they immediately clashed on the field and in the air and sea. Like Chernobyl and a few ports. Kyvi airport has changed hands a few times and repelled advances. Like Kharkiv and others.

The tactics have changed into Urban retreat, and defense when fighting far superior numbers and a better equipped force, where fighting has been at its thickest. Supposedly taking longer for Russia to advance and indeed capture, as many cities are still in conflict. However they would be anyway as Urban centers. Like dated castles under seige took time to seige.

I am not picking sides. But that type of tactic has adapted on the field in modern warfare since places like Syria and Iraq.

But you can imagine cities using dead zones, lining roads with IEDs, and using so much of their environment for cover, and advantage, and also having hidden access across them from sewers, or metros, etc, and being incredibly dug in. While also using drones and snipers etc.

No different tactics. A tactic Russia itself knows and has used in WW2.

No because of the latest battlefield tactics.

Many immediate positions were overrun on the field where they clashed to defend the border advances, and breakout from former separatist regions, and the Crimea. Some are still in place across the country, and largely still intact in others, perhaps across the West, but in the places where they immediately clashed on the field and in the air and sea. Like Chernobyl and a few ports. Kyvi airport has changed hands a few times and repelled advances. Like Kharkiv and others.

The tactics have changed into Urban retreat, and defense when fighting far superior numbers and a better equipped force, where fighting has been at its thickest. Supposedly taking longer for Russia to advance and indeed capture, as many cities are still in conflict. However they would be anyway as Urban centers. Like dated castles under seige took time to seige.

I am not picking sides. But that type of tactic has adapted on the field in modern warfare since places like Syria and Iraq.

But you can imagine cities using dead zones, lining roads with IEDs, and using so much of their environment for cover, and advantage, and also having hidden access across them from sewers, or metros, etc, and being incredibly dug in. While also using drones and snipers etc.

No different tactics.

No because of the latest battlefield tactics.

Many immediate positions were overrun on the field where they clashed to defend the border advances, and breakout from former separatist regions, and the Crimea. Some are still in place across the country, and largely still intact in others, perhaps across the West, but in the places where they immediately clashed on the field and in the air and sea. Like Chernobyl and a few ports. Kyvi airport has changed hands a few times and repelled advances. Like Kharkiv and others.

The tactics have changed into Urban retreat, and defense when fighting far superior numbers and a better equipped force, where fighting has been at its thickest. Supposedly taking longer for Russia to advance and indeed capture, as many cities are still in conflict. However they would be anyway as Urban centers. Like dated castles under seige took time to seige.

I am not picking sides. But that type of tactic has adapted on the field in modern warfare since places like Syria and Iraq.

But you can imagine cities using dead zones, lining roads with IEDs, and using so much of their environment for cover, and advantage, and also having hidden access across them from sewers, or metros, and being incredibly dug in. While also using drones and snipers etc.