There's a reason it's called the red army. Play on words. But historically. Messy. While the West tends to employ far more words and sanctions and propaganda.

But in answer no, not the mindset at all.

At this point it's all in. It has been since diplomacy has failed, and any terms or concessions, have escalated into confrontation and warfare. There are still truces to be made. But Russia will do it from strength, before fully seeking them, as existing terms and preconditions weren't met.

Both know the battle for Kyvi would be pivotal. It is where some of the fiercest fighting has been and likewise in its second city and many others when it descends into urban combat. But you can bet yeah. Once command structures go, that traction gains ground quickly. So it has been imperative to hold them together and propagate morale.

While I might agree with some existing assessments that it has been messy perhaps slightly rushed at Kyvi because of its representation to the battlefield. But I don't agree with everything aired. No it doesn't mean if it goes Ukraine completely folds, but from there any ground becomes dominated. Currently almost everything is supporting it. I bet it will become more formulated as Eastern positions become overrun. The airfield there has been quite bloody perhaps changing hands a few times. Important for Kyvi supply lines. But once it's surrounded by formation and formulation as with any previous waves in attack patterns, by wave 10 those bosses are even stronger.

Edit; busy. But yes. Perhaps a position of dominance would be assertive of that Eastern Geography and further squeezing the largest city into terms or truce. I don't think at this point by further being pressed into it they have much to lose by not fully demilitarising the resistance.

I would hate to guess. Messy above btw doesn't mean unprofessional, it simply means it has always fought harder despite losses, or an assumption of weakness. In regards to an enemy menacing and perhaps even cannibalistic.

There's a reason it's called the red army. Play on words. But historically. Messy. While the West tends to employ far more words and sanctions and propaganda.

But in answer no, not the mindset at all.

At this point it's all in. It has been since diplomacy has failed, and any terms or concessions, have escalated into confrontation and warfare. There are still truces to be made. But Russia will do it from strength before fully seeking them as existing terms and preconditions weren't met.

Both know the battle for Kyvi would be pivotal. It is where some of the fiercest fighting has been and likewise in its second city and many others when it descends into urban combat. But you can bet yeah. Once command structures go, that traction gains ground quickly. So it has been imperative to hold them together and propagate morale.

While I might agree with some existing assessments that it has been messy perhaps slightly rushed at Kyvi because of its representation to the battlefield. But I don't agree with everything aired. No it doesn't mean if it goes Ukraine completely folds but from there any ground becomes dominated. Currently almost everything is supporting it. I bet it will become more formulated as Eastern positions become overrun. The airfield there has been quite bloody perhaps changing hands. Important for Kyvi supply lines. But once it's surrounded by formation and formulation as with any previous waves in attack patterns, by wave 10 those bosses are even stronger.

Edit; busy. But yes. Perhaps a position of dominance would be assertive of that Eastern Geography and further squeezing the largest city into terms or truce. I don't think at this point by further being pressed into it they have much to lose by not fully demilitarising the resistance.

I would hate to guess. Messy above btw doesn't mean unprofessional it simply means it has always fought harder despite losses or an assumption of weakness. In regards to an enemy menacing and perhaps even cannibalistic.

There's a reason it's called the red army. Play on words. But historically. Messy. While the West tends to employ far more words and sanctions and propaganda.

But in answer no, not the mindset at all.

At this point it's all in. It has been since diplomacy has failed, and any terms or concessions, have escalated into confrontation and warfare. There are still truces to be made. But Russia will do it from strength before fully seeking them as existing terms and preconditions weren't met.

Both know the battle for Kyvi would be pivotal. It is where some of the fiercest fighting has been and likewise in its second city and many others when it descends into urban combat. But you can bet yeah. Once command structures go, that traction gains ground quickly. So it has been imperative to hold them together and propagate morale.

While I might agree with some existing assessments that it has been messy perhaps slightly rushed at Kyvi because of its representation to the battlefield. But I don't agree with everything aired. No it doesn't mean if it goes Ukraine completely folds but from there any ground becomes dominated. Currently almost everything is supporting it. I bet it will become more formulated as Eastern positions become overrun. The airfield there has been quite bloody perhaps changing hands. Important for Kyvi supply lines. But once it's surrounded by formation and formulation as with any previous waves in attack patterns, by wave 10 those bosses are even stronger.