They did. He never resurrected in versions of the bible where over a period of around a 100 years competing practices of Christianity fought over the beliefs of the founding print. There is also questions of his disciples, the amount claimed, and the testaments or chapters omitted. Like Thomas and Magdalane. In any event resurrection won, his wife was also omitted, and any original scrolls have been reworded numerously. Monks rewrote on top of the original vellums a few times.

There is also Mithriasm which has a huge resemblance to Christainity. Debates on which is in fact older despite them both sharing the same era. Mithriasm is, but it won't be documented as such.

They did. He never resurrected in versions of the bible where over a period of around a 100 years competing practices of Christianity fought over the beliefs of the founding print. There is also questions of his disciples, the amount claimed, and the testaments or chapters omitted. Like Thomas and Magdalane. In any event resurrection won, his wife was also omitted, and any original scrolls have been reworded numerously. Monks rewrote on top of the original vellums a few times.

There is also Mithriasm which has a huge resemblance to Christainity. Debates on which is in fact older despite them both sharing the same era. Mithriasm is, but it won't documented as.

They did. He never resurrected in versions of the bible where over a period of around a 100 years competing practices of Christianity fought over the beliefs of the founding print. There is also questions of his disciples, the amount claimed, and the testaments or chapters omitted. Like Thomas and Magdalane.