Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

If you declare somethig as pathogen you have to present a solid proof that this thing really generate a pathology. Finding that thing in already sick people does not prove that. Declaring something as pathogen just because you find it in some of sick persons proves absolutely nothing. With same shitty logic you could declare cucumbers a pathogen that cause COVID, because most of sick people eat cucumbers before getting sick.

So, proving that presumed pathogen is one and only cause of some pathology is essential. It is about pure logic, and no any demagogy could free anybody from providing that proof.

Since we still have no such solid proof in over two years, all that covid shit is a 100% hoax.

2 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

If you declare somethig as pathogen you have to present a solid proof that this thing really generate a pathology. Finding that thing in already sick people does not prove that. Decalring something as pathogen just because you find it in some of sick persons proves absolutely nothing. With same shitty logic you could declare cucumbers a pathogen that cause COVID, because most of sick people eat cucumbers before getting sick.

So, proving that presumed pathogen is one and only cause of some pathology is essential. It is about pure logic, and no any demagogy could free anybody from providing that proof.

Since we still have no such solid proof in over two years, all that covid shit is a 100% hoax.

2 years ago
1 score