Do you concede that, because the Soviets also put a retroreflector on the moon, it does not follow that retroreflectors are sufficient evidence that we put men on the moon? So far, other than that you have provided nothing but theory. You need extraordinary evidence to back up your extraordinary claim. The time to believe something is AFTER sufficient evidence has been supplied for it. You're asking me to prove a negative which is not logically possible. I'm asking you to defend your extraordinary claim. Sorry, the word of disgraced president Richard Nixon, 12 astronauts (who also claim there are aliens), and that blurry video is not enough.

Do you concede that, because the Soviets also put a retroreflector on the moon, it does not follow that retroreflectors are sufficient evidence that we put men on the moon? So far, you have provided nothing but theory. You need extraordinary evidence to back up your extraordinary claim. The time to believe something is AFTER sufficient evidence has been supplied for it. You're asking me to prove a negative which is not logically possible. I'm asking you to defend your extraordinary claim. Sorry, the word of disgraced president Richard Nixon, 12 astronauts (who also claim there are aliens), and that blurry video is not enough.

Do you concede that, because the Soviets also put a retroreflector on the moon, it does not follow that retroreflectors are sufficient evidence that we put men on the moon? So far, you have provided nothing but theory. You need extraordinary evidence to back up your extraordinary claim. The time to believe something is AFTER sufficient evidence has been supplied for it. You're asking me to prove a negative which is not logically possible. I'm asking you to defend your extraordinary claim. Sorry, the word of disgraced president Richard Nixon, 12 astronauts who also claim their are nazi moonbases and aliens, and that blurry video is not enough.

Do you concede that, because the Soviets also put a retroreflector on the moon, it does not follow that retroreflectors are sufficient evidence that we put men on the moon? So far, you have provided nothing but theory. You need extraordinary evidence to back up your extraordinary claim. The time to believe something is AFTER sufficient evidence has been supplied for it. You're asking me to prove a negative which is not logically possible. I'm asking you to defend your extraordinary claim. Sorry, the word of disgraced president Richard Nixon, 12 astronauts who also claim their are nazi bases and aliens, and that blurry video is not enough.

Do you concede that, because the Soviets also put a retroreflector on the moon, it does not follow that retroreflectors are sufficient evidence that we put men on the moon? So far, you have provided nothing but theory. You need extraordinary evidence to back up your extraordinary claim. The time to believe something is AFTER sufficient evidence has been supplied for it. You're asking me to prove a negative which is not logically possible. I'm asking you to defend your extraordinary claim. Sorry, the word of disgraced president Richard Nixon, 12 astronauts, and that blurry video is not enough.

Do you concede that, because the Soviets also put a retroreflector on the moon, it does not follow that retroreflectors are sufficient evidence that we put men on the moon? So far, you have provided nothing but theory. You need extraordinary evidence to back up your extraordinary claim. The time to believe something is AFTER sufficient evidence has been supplied for it. You're asking me to prove a negative which is not logically possible. I'm asking you to defend your extraordinary claim. Sorry, the word of disgraced president Richard Nixon and that blurry video is not enough.