Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

I don't care much about all that historic crap to bother myself with spending time to dig proofs for some internet nickname. And how that proofs should look like to satisfy you? Some official site where will be another document saying that some other document was rewritten, with stamps and signatures? Are you kidding me?

You could easily find articles about how USSR authorities edited photos and pictures even in scholar books, removing objectionable persons from images. Stalin shills removed his enemies from books, changed historic facts and documents to fit the narrative, then, Khrushchev shills removed Stalin and Co from history and changed facts and documents to fit the narrative, Then Khrushchev become unwanted in history... Even national anthem had changed few times. Archives definitely was edited too, some documents disappeared, some appeared, not event taking in account that huge part of USSR archves, especially documents from 1920-s to 1970-s, many other documents linked to is still classified (or said that they are classified because they just don't exists - nobody knows).

In official documents you will find only the things they want you to find. It is not a good and verifiable source of information at all and never was. History is written by winners, is that a discovery for you? The only way you could know something about the past is your relatives memories. Everything else is much worse source of information about history.

You have to be completely retarded asking some "proofs" of rewriting documents when right now that fucking WHO and health institutions of every fucking country rewriting history, documents and even science RIGHT BEFORE YOUR OWN EYES IN REALTIME.

History is not a science, so there could not be a solid scientific proofs. Why spent time for that crap?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

I don't care much about all that historic crap to bother myself with spending time to dig proofs for some internet nickname. And how that proofs should look like to satisfy you? Some official site where will be another document saying that some other document was rewritten, with stamps and signatures? Are you kidding me?

You could easily find articles about how USSR authorities edited photos and pictures even in scholar books, removing objectionable persons from images. Stalin shills removed his enemies from books, changed historic facts about him, then, Khrushchev shills removed Stalin and Co from history and changed facts to fit the narrative, Then Khrushchev become unwanted in history... Even national anthem changed few times. Archives definitely was edited too, some documents disappeared, some appeared, not event taking in account that huge part of USSR archves, especially from 1920-s to 1970-s is still classified.

In official documents you will find only the things they want you to find. It is not a good and verifiable source of information at all and never was. History is written by winners, is that a discovery for you? The only way you could know something about the past is your relatives memories. Everything else is much worse source of information about history.

You have to be completely retarded asking some "proofs" of rewriting documents when right now that fucking WHO and health institutions of every fucking country rewriting history, documents and even science RIGHT BEFORE YOUR OWN EYES IN REALTIME.

History is not a science, so there could not be a solid scientific proofs. Why spent time for that crap?

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

I don't care much about all that historic crap to bother myself with spending time to dig proofs for some internet nickname. And how that proofs should look like to satisfy you? Some official site where will be another document saying that some other document was rewritten, with stamps and signatures? Are you kidding me?

You could easily find articles about how USSR authorities edited photos and pictures even in scholar books, removing objectionable persons from images. Stalin shills removed his enemies from books, changed historic facts about him, then, Khrushchev shills removed Stalin and Co from history and changed facts to fit the narrative, Then Khrushchev become unwanted in history... Even national anthem changed few times. Archives definitely was edited too, some documents disappeared, some appeared, not event taking in account that huge part of USSR archves, especially from 1920-s to 1970-s is still classified.

In official documents you will find only the things they want you to find. It is not a good and verifiable source of information at all and never was. History is written by winners, is that a discovery for you? The only way you could know something about the past is your relatives memories. Everything else is much worse source of information about history.

History is not a science, so there could not be a solid scientific proofs. Why spent time for that crap?

3 years ago
1 score