Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

It depends on how we define "serious" too. I'm not sure we are comparing apples to apples when looking at vaxx serious effects and COVID-19.

Any government data has too much bias built in too. VAERS reports are way under counting, while government collected COVID data is always over counting. So I think we may even be seeing more truth just by looking at professional athletes and other people in the public eye. They have no where to hide which eliminates some of the bias of the previous data collection. From those observations in the younger demographic it looks like vaxx serious injury compared to COVID could be 10x or 20x more. Maybe even worse than that.

And then there is the problem of industry backed adverse reaction studies. Those are what many people use but I don't trust those fraudsters whatsoever. I'd want a study by a University not funded by industry and done more recently so now they know more of what to look for. They should all do MRIs of the heart, take blood samples, look for microclots, etc.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It depends on how we define "serious". I'm not sure we are comparing apples to apples when looking at vaxx serious effects and COVID-19.

Any government data has too much bias built in too. VAERS reports are way under counting, while government collected COVID data is always over counting. So I think we may even be seeing more truth just by looking at professional athletes and other people in the public eye. They have no where to hide which eliminates some of the bias of the previous data collection. From those observations in the younger demographic it looks like vaxx serious injury compared to COVID could be 10x or 20x more. Maybe even worse than that.

And then there is the problem of industry backed adverse reaction studies. Those are what many people use but I don't trust those fraudsters whatsoever. I'd want a study by a University not funded by industry and done more recently so now they know more of what to look for. They should all do MRIs of the heart, take blood samples, look for microclots, etc.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

It depends on how we define "serious". I'm not sure we are comparing apples to apples when looking at vaxx serious effects and COVID-19.

Any government data has too much bias built in too. VAERS reports are way under counting, while government collected COVID data is always over counting. So I think we may even be seeing more truth just by looking at professional athletes and other people in the public eye. They have no where to hide which eliminates some of the bias of the previous data collection. From those observations in the younger demographic it looks like vaxx serious injury compared to COVID could be 10x or 20x more. Maybe even worse than that.

And then there is the problem of industry backed adverse reaction studies. Those are what many people use but I don't trust those fraudsters whatsoever. I'd want a study by a University not funded by industry and done more recently so now they know more of what to look for.

3 years ago
1 score