Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

Again, I mostly agree, as I stated I don’t use either. However, you sound like someone who is an absolutist who enjoys making personal decisions for other people.

I know people are being educated in our type of realism on FB and Twitter, and people are waking up to things we both agree to be problems. Being censored and deplatformed only draws attention to —and inflates the cause and numbers of those exposing malice and corruption in our leadership classes. Everyone is spreading their own shitty propaganda there, so effectively you are saying plandemic-type docs and articles exposing politicians and failures in leadership shouldn’t be posted there for the whole world to see? We should just keep the info here on .win for our select and chosen few? Are you saying the same thing they are saying? Defacto censorship?

Wishing really hard everyone would leave FB is like gun control nuts saying “if we ban all guns, there’ll be no gun violence!” Social media, like guns, or alcohol— is engrained into our society at every level so much it’s interwoven into our lives. (Not mine, but 8/10 people)——- Spreading truth on a platform of lies with a large reach, hijacking the INGSOC radio channel to espouse a message of freedom, hacking the software of a machine designed to kill you— these i see as typically noble actions. I do appreciate your input, though, I do. Have an updoot.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Again, I mostly agree, as I stated I don’t use either. However, you sound like someone who is an absolutist who enjoys making personal decisions for other people. I know people are being educated in our type of realism on FB and Twitter, and people are waking up to things we both agree to be problems. Being censored and deplatformed only draws attention to —and inflates the cause and numbers of those exposing malice and corruption in our leadership classes. Everyone is spreading their own shitty propaganda there, so effectively you are saying plandemic-type docs and articles exposing politicians and failures in leadership shouldn’t be posted there for the whole world to see? We should just keep the info here on .win for our select and chosen few? Are you saying the same thing they are saying? Defacto censorship? Wishing really hard everyone would leave FB is like gun control nuts saying “if we ban all guns, there’ll be no gun violence!” Social media, like guns, or alcohol— is engrained into our society at every level so much it’s interwoven into our lives. (Not mine, but 8/10 people)——- I do appreciate your input, though, I do. Have an updoot.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Again, I mostly agree, as I stated I don’t use either. However, you sound like someone who is an absolutist who enjoys making personal decisions for other people. I know people are being educated in our type of realism on FB and Twitter, and people are waking up to things we both agree to be problems. Being censored and deplatformed only draws attention to —and inflates the cause and numbers of those exposing malice and corruption in our leadership classes. Everyone is spreading their own shitty propaganda there, so you’re saying plandemic-type docs and articles exposing politicians and failures in leadership shouldn’t be posted there? Are you saying the same thing they are saying? Defacto censorship? Wishing really hard everyone would leave FB is like gun control nuts saying “if we ban all guns, there’ll be no gun violence!” Social media, like guns, or alcohol— is engrained into our society at every level so much it’s interwoven into our lives. (Not mine, but 8/10 people)——- I do appreciate your input, though, I do. Have an updoot.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Again, I mostly agree, as I stated I don’t use either. However, you sound like someone who is an absolutist who enjoys making personal decisions for other people. I know people are being educated in our type of realism on FB and Twitter, and people are waking up to things we both agree to be problems. Being censored and deplatformed only draws attention to —and inflates the cause and numbers of those exposing malice and corruption in our leadership classes. Everyone is spreading their own shitty propaganda there, so you’re saying plandemic-type docs and articles exposing politicians and failures in leadership shouldn’t be posted there? Are you saying the same thing they are saying? Defacto censorship? Wishing really hard everyone would leave FB is like gun control nuts saying “if we ban all guns, there’ll be no gun violence!” Social media, like guns, is engrained into our society at every level so much it’s interwoven into our lives. (Not mine, but 8/10 people)——- I do appreciate your input, though, I do. Have an updoot.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Again, I mostly agree, as I stated I don’t use either. However, you sound like someone who is an absolutist who enjoys making personal decisions for other people. I know people are being educated in our type of realism on FB and Twitter, and people are waking up to things we both agree to be problems. Being censored and deplatformed only draws attention to —and inflates the cause and numbers of those exposing malice and corruption in our leadership classes. Everyone is spreading their own shitty propaganda there, so you’re saying plandemic-type docs and articles exposing politicians and failures in leadership shouldn’t be posted there? Are you saying the same thing they are saying? Defacto censorship? I appreciate your input, though, I do. Have an updoot.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Again, I mostly agree, as I stated I don’t use either. However, you sound like someone who is an absolutist who enjoys making personal decisions for other people. I know people are being educated in our type of realism on FB and Twitter, and people are waking up to things we both agree to be problems. Being censored and deplatformed only draws attention to —and inflates the cause and numbers of those exposing malice and corruption in our leadership classes. Everyone is spreading their propoganda there, so you’re saying plandemic docs and articles exposing politicians and failures in leadership shouldn’t be posted there? Are you saying the same thing they are saying? Defacto censorship? I appreciate your input, though, I do. Have an updoot.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

Again, I mostly agree, as I stated I don’t use either. However, you sound like someone who is an absolutist who enjoys making personal decisions for other people. I know people are being educated in our type of realism on FB and Twitter, and people are waking up to things we both agree to be problems. Being censored and deplatformed only draws attention to —and inflates the cause and numbers of those exposing malice and corruption in our leadership classes. Everyone is spreading their propoganda there, so you’re saying plandemic docs shouldn’t be posted there? Are you saying the same thing they are saying? Defacto censorship? I appreciate your input, though, I do. Have an updoot.

3 years ago
1 score