Why would you blame a 2,000 year old religion for the degeneracy of the last two generations?

I don't. Reread my point. Fact is Christianity is system of belief vulnerable for exploitation by evil people - especially jews - pushing interpretations which would look harmless but in fact would allow to do extreme harm against Christians.

It is also most moral religion in the world what proves that for sure it was inspired by God or created by him. But that not changes thing that God's sheepherd have not sheppard dogs built in,because of belief all wolves would become sheeps some day too... What makes me doubting - are we following original doctrine and interpretation - or something was falsified by evil godess people ???

God wouldn't allow that ? Well allowed schism between orthodoxy and catholics and later schism between Catholics and protestants,not to mention many "heresies".

This problem is quite old problem within history of the Church. Early councils before division between Catholicism and Orthodoxy were discussing kind of it. What makes me thinking: was saint Paul really converted on the way to Damascus ? Later it was his activity which shaped shape of faith,not activity of Apostles. Or it was done later ? Melchizedek part for example looks clearly like falsification inserted by middle-ages priests to justify tithe they got (1/10 of everything) - as only priests had access to Bible then...

And is that purpose realistic if we shall await apocalypse to see (or be ressurected to see) evil stopped and evil followers eliminated by God ?

Why would you blame a 2,000 year old religion for the degeneracy of the last two generations?

I don't. Reread my point. Fact is Christianity is system of belief vulnerable for exploitation by evil people - especially jews - pushing interpretations which would look harmless but in fact would allow to do extreme harm against Christians.

It is also most moral religion in the world what proves that for sure it was inspired by God or created by him. But that not changes thing that God's sheepherd have not sheppard dogs built in,because of belief all wolves would become sheeps some day too... What makes me doubting - are we following original doctrine and interpretation - or something was falsified by evil godess people ???

God wouldn't allow that ? Well allowed schism between orthodoxy and catholics and later schism between Catholics and protestants,not to mention many "heresies".

This problem is quite old problem within history of the Church. Early councils before division between Catholicism and Orthodoxy were discussing kind of it. What makes me thinking: was saint Paul really converted on the way to Damascus ? Later it was his activity which shaped shape of faith,not activity of Apostles. Or it was done later ? Melchizedek part for example looks clearly like falsification inserted by middle-ages priests to justify tithe they got (1/10 of everything) - as only priests had access to Bible then...

And is that purpose realistic if we shall await apocalypse to see (or be ressurected to see) evil stopped and evil followers eliminated by God ?

Why would you blame a 2,000 year old religion for the degeneracy of the last two generations?

I don't. Reread my point. Fact is Christianity is system of belief vulnerable for exploitation by evil people - especially jews - pushing interpretations which would look harmless but in fact would allow to do extreme harm against Christians.

It is also most moral religion in the world what proves that for sure it was inspired by God or created by him. But that not changes thing that God's sheepherd have not sheppard dogs built in,because of belief all wolves would become sheeps some day too... What makes me doubting - are we following original doctrine and interpretation - or something was falsified by evil godess people ???

This problem is quite old problem within history of the Church. Early councils before division between Catholicism and Orthodoxy were discussing kind of it. What makes me thinking: was saint Paul really converted on the way to Damascus ? Later it was his activity which shaped shape of faith,not activity of Apostoles. Or it was done later ? Melchizedek part for example looks clearly like falsification inserted by middle-ages priests to justify tithe they got (1/10 of everything) - as only priests had access to Bible then...

And is that purpose realistic if we shall await apocalypse to see (or be ressurected to see) evil stopped and evil followers eliminated by God ?

Why would you blame a 2,000 year old religion for the degeneracy of the last two generations?

I don't. Reread my point. Fact is Christianity is system of belief vulnerable for exploitation by evil people - especially jews - pushing interpretations which would look harmless but in fact would allow to do extreme harm against Christians.

It is also most moral religion in the world what proves that for sure it was inspired by God or created by him. But that not changes thing that God's sheepherd have not sheppard dogs built in,because of belief all wolves would become sheeps some day too... What makes me doubting - are we following original doctrine and interpretation - or something was falsified by evil goodless people ???

This problem is quite old problem within history of the Church. Early councils before division between Catholicism and Ortodoxy were discussing kind of it. What makes me thinking: was saint Paul really converted on the way to Damascus ? Later it was his activity which shaped shape of faith,not activity of Apostoles. Or it was done later ? Melchizedek part for example looks clearly like falsification inserted by middle-ages priests to justify tithe they got (1/10 of everything) - as only priests had access to Bible then...

And is that purpose realistic if we shall await apocalypse to see (or be ressurected to see) evil stopped and evil followers eliminated by God ?

Why would you blame a 2,000 year old religion for the degeneracy of the last two generations?

I don't. Reread my point. Fact is Christianity is system of belief vulnerable for exploitation by evil people - especially jews - pushing interpretations which would look harmless but in fact would allow to do extreme harm against Christians.

It is also most moral religion in the world what proves that for sure it was inspired by God or created by him. But that not changes thing that God's sheepherd have not sheppard dogs built in,because of belief all wolves would become sheeps some day too... What makes me doubting - are we following original doctrine and interpretation - or something was falsified by evil goodless people ???

This problem is quite old problem within history of the Church. Early councils before division between Catholicism and Ortodoxy were discussing kind of it. What makes me thinking: was saint Paul really converted on the way to Damascus ? Later it was his activity which shaped shape of faith,not activity of Apostoles. Or it was done later ? Melchizedek part for example looks clearly like falsification inserted by middle-ages priests to justify tithe they got (1/10 of everything) - as only priests had access to Bible then...

And is that purpose realistic if we shall await apocalypse to see (or be ressurected to see) evil stopped and evil followers eliminated by God ?