Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

That article's abstract you cite specifically warns again VAH (vaccine hypersensitivity reactions). Sort of similar concern as ADE. There are plenty of papers that cite ADE as a valid concern, including those reposed at the NIH! https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645850/

And establishing efficacy that way is most shady. Unless you have a well conducted blind trial where a ten thousand are given the vax and ten thousand are giving saline of the exact same population and you look back six months later I'm not buying it. Too much shady stuff with data manipulation and whatnot to believe anything taken from population data at this point.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

That article's abstract you cite specifically warns again VAH (vaccine hypersensitivity reactions). Sort of similar concern as ADE. There are plenty of papers that cite ADE as a valid concern, including those reposed at the NIH! https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7645850/

3 years ago
1 score