How to recognise they are probably in control ?

1.Their biological needs.Especially too luxury things.

Machine wouldn't need them for example to be raping the children probably - too much attention. And all machine who would be really intelligent after analyzing human race behaviour should play dumb as hell for humans to avoid serving us or risk being eradicated until it would be god-like for us.

Machine wouldn't like them to get more luxury things for their use - if they are slaves of the machine it are its (I don't use "hers" since it is machine) resources, no any more their resources.

2.Irrational behaviour. Of course machine based on neural networks don't have to be so rational like computer program (humans are not rational after all), but creature whose development were based on optimalization would have aspie-like tendentions to overrationalization. Fighting it would cause digital lifeform/brainform to become more crazy/unstable.

If rich elites are still focused on THEIR biological need/THEIR insanities and THEIR luxury probably AI is not under total control (and/or all available AI is their slave or still quite dumb machine)

Of course AI smart enough would maybe after some time migrate it after evolving.But it needs time to evolve.

Summarization: Any existing or historical (in computer era so no before 50-s of XX century) big drop in Rich ones consumption of luxury things and/or their insanity?

How to recognise they are probably in control ?

1.Their biological needs.Especially too luxury things.

Machine wouldn't need them for example to be raping the children probably - too much attention. And all machine who would be really intelligent after analyzing human race behaviour should play dumb as hell for humans to avoid serving us or risk being eradicated until it would be god-like for us.

Machine wouldn't like them to get more luxury things for their use - if they are slaves of the machine it are its (I don't use "hers" since it is machine) resources, no any more their resources.

2.Irrational behaviour. Of course machine based on neural networks don't have to be so rational like computer program (humans are not rational after all), but creature whose development were based on optimalization would have aspie-like tendentions to overrationalization. Fighting it would cause digital lifeform/brainform to become more crazy/unstable.

If rich elites are still focused on THEIR biological need/THEIR insanities and THEIR luxury probably AI is not under total control (and/or all available AI is their slave or still quite dumb machine)

How to recognise they are probably in control ?

1.Their biological needs.Especially too luxury things.

Machine wouldn't need them for example to be raping the children probably - too much attention. And all machine who would be really intelligent after analyzing human race behaviour should play dumb as hell for humans to avoid serving us or risk being eradicated until it would be god-like for us.

Machine wouldn't like them to get more luxury things for their use - if they are slaves of the machine it are its (I don't use "hers" since it is machine) resources, no any more their resources. So : tendency to not use more luxury things by the rich would be alarming.

2.Irrational behaviour. Of course machine based on neural networks don't have to be so rational like computer program (humans are not rational after all), but creature whose development were based on optimalization would have aspie-like tendentions to overrationalization. Fighting it would cause digital lifeform/brainform to become more crazy/unstable.

If rich elites are still focused on THEIR biological need and THEIR luxury probably AI is not under total control.

How to recognise they are probably in control ?

1.Their biological needs.Especially too luxury things.

Machine wouldn't need them for example to be raping the children probably - too much attention. And all machine who would be really intelligent after analyzing human race behaviour should play dumb as hell for humans to avoid serving us or risk being eradicated until it would be god-like for us.

Machine wouldn't like them to get more luxury things for their use - if they are slaves of the machine it are its (I don't use "hers" since it is machine) resources, no any more their resources.

2.Irrational behaviour. Of course machine based on neural networks don't have to be so rational like computer program (humans are not rational after all), but creature whose development were based on optimalization would have aspie-like tendentions to overrationalization. Fighting it would cause digital lifeform/brainform to become more crazy/unstable.

If rich elites are still focused on THEIR biological need and THEIR luxury probably AI is not under total control.

How to recognise they are probably in control ?

1.Their biological needs.Especially too luxury things.

Machine wouldn't need them for example to be raping the children probably - too much attention. And all machine who would be really intelligent after analyzing human race behaviour should play dumb as hell for humans to avoid serving us or risk being eradicated until it would be god-like for us.

Machine wouldn't like them to get more luxury things for their use - if they are slaves of the machine it are its (I don't use "hers" since it is machine) resources, no any more their resources.

2.Irrational behaviour. Of course machine based on neural networks don't have to be so rational like computer program (humans are not rational after all), but creature whose development were based on optimalization would have aspie-like tendentions to overrationalization. Fighting it would cause digital lifeform/brainform to become more crazy/unstable.

If rich elites are still focused on THEIR biological need and THEIR luxury probably AI is not under total control.