Yours is a wonderful comment. If a company offers a (fill in the blank)-as-a-service its stock valuation increases. Drug companies would do just about anything to create a situation where everyone on earth must take their shots at least every year for their entire lives. However, one aspect (your first example) strikes me as not quite right.

• Buying house -> Renting one

Renting and landlords have been around for hundreds of years. The new model for land ownership is modelled after the Chinese system. You can have a house, but you get permission from the government to place your house on the land and cannot own the land. They have already copied this model in places like Thailand and the idea is to impose this sort of "land reform" on the rest of the world.

Yours is a wonderful comment. If a company offers a (fill in the blank)-as-a-service, its stock valuation increases. Drug companies would do just about anything to create a situation where everyone on earth must take their shots at least every year for their entire lives. However, one aspect (your first example) strikes me as not quite right.

• Buying house -> Renting one

Renting and landlords have been around for hundreds of years. The new model for land ownership is modelled after the way the do it in China. You can have a house, but you get permission from the government to place your house on the land and cannot own the land. They have already copied this model in places like Thailand and the idea is to impose this sort of "land reform" on the rest of the world.

Yours is a wonderful comment. If a company offers a (fill in the blank)-as-a-service its stock valuation increases. Drug companies would do just about anything to create a situation where everyone on earth must take their shots at least every year for their entire lives. However, one aspect (your first example) strikes me as not quite right.

• Buying house -> Renting one

Renting and landlords have been around for hundreds of years. The new model for land ownership is modelled after the way the do it in China. You can have a house, but you get permission from the government to place your house on the land and cannot own the land. They have already copied this model in places like Thailand and the idea is to impose this sort of "land reform" on the rest of the world.

Yours is a wonderful comment. If a company offers a (fill in the blank)-as-a-service its stock valuation increases. Drug companies would do just about anything to create a situation where everyone on earth must take their shots at least every year for their entire lives. However, one aspect (your first example) strikes me as not quite right.

• Buying house -> Renting one

Renting and landlords have been around for hundreds of years. The new model for land ownership is modelled after the way the do it in China. You can have a house, but you get permission from the government to place your house on the land and cannot own the land. They have copied this model in places like Thailand.