Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

On that one I have to disagree. The early nukes were real and were witnessed by various reputable scientists. One of my professors, Richard Feynman, not only worked on the Manhattan Project but was present at early tests, and he described the explosions. In particular, the nukes emit ultraviolet and gamma rays that no conventional explosive gives out. And the use of Geiger counters shows right away the sites were radioactive.

Also there is a LOT of evidence that atomic explosives are real. Basically any of our nuclear power plants could blow up if it were not for elaborate preventatives in the mechanisms. Everyone in the power industry knows it, nuclear sub technicians know it. A final proof that bombs blew up is that the sites were and are radioactive. A conventional bomb would not do that nor create the special radioactive isotopes that only a nuke could make. In fact, the damn early air bursts contaminated the globe with radioactive cobalt. After they learned better, they started putting tests underground.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

On that one I have to disagree. The early nukes were real and were witnessed by various reputable scientists. One of my professors, Richard Feynman, not only worked on the Manhattan Project but was present at early tests, and he described the explosions. In particular, the nukes emit ultraviolet and gamma rays that no conventional explosive gives out. And the use of Geiger counters shows right away the sites were radioactive.

Also there is a LOT of evidence that atomic explosives are real. Basically any of our nuclear power plants could blow up if it were not for elaborate preventatives in the mechanisms. Everyone in the power industry knows it, nuclear sub technicians know it. A final proof that bombs blew up is that the sites were and are radioactive. A conventional bomb would not do that nor create the special radioactive isotopes that only a nuke could make. In fact, the damn early air bursts contamimated the globe with radioactive cobalt. After they learned better, they started putting tests underground.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

On that one I have to disagree. The early nukes were real and were witnessed by various reputable scientists. One of my professors, Richard Feynman, not only worked on the Manhattan Project but was present at early tests, and he described the explosions. Also there is a LOT of evidence that atomic explosives are real. Basically any of our nuclear power plants could blow up if it were not for elaborate preventatives in the mechanisms. Everyone in the power industry knows it, nuclear sub technicians know it. A final proof that bombs blew up is that the sites were and are radioactive. A conventional bomb would not do that nor create the special radioactive isotopes that only a nuke could make.

3 years ago
1 score