Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Sign In
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Reason: None provided.

You are right about nuclear. Fusion reactors are still experimental and cost far too much to power. The super heated plasma wear electromagnets down after a few attemps. Rare earth parts. But the energy they need to turn on and then to harness the plasma for just over a minute isn't viable yet as an energy source. It is expunging energy quicker than it's producing. There is no stable field keeping it harnessed indefinitely to draw on any energy.

Green is the absolute opposite of green. Nothing but mindless stupidity has produced products like solar panels needing far more production to draw on any energy from, they work in space not on Earth full of natural fuel. They have no lifetime, impossible to repair yourself, a piece of shit throwaway, made to break to cost more on the next battery and service, and fitting. Inflation. They still need other power sources of fossil fuels to manufacture, glass and plastic casings, and to also use as a backup when there is no sun. Solar panels aren't recyclable. They are full of lead and acid and plastic. So they bury them rather than attempt recycling. Billions of tonnes of their waste litter our planet already from their bullshit ponzi. A ponzi that has been here for a blink, and is devastating. Solar also needs batteries, the most emitting industry, on this planet, outside of concrete. Turbines are as environmentally impacting. They are made out of fossil fuels. They also need fossil fuels to install, big trucks and ships with huge cranes, running on fuel. The blades of turbines don't recycle they are made out of carbon fibre, it isn't recycleable. Turbines need fossil fuel backup when there is no wind. If they are put on land it needs deforesting to get the wind. In the ocean it needs tonnes of concrete and boring into the seabed to place. They are more expensive than nuclear to use. Example, a turbine farm costs 6 billion to fit into the sea. Sometimes less. But this was the latest and it is a huge farm. It powers a few hundred thousand homes under a million, sometimes more, if it has stormsurge making peak energy, rarely. If it does the turbines need new blades, breaking yearly. Nuclear power plant powers a few million homes costing 10-20 billion. Both need heaps of maintenance. But the turbine degrades far quicker with a lifespan of just over 20 years and the blades break much quicker needing refitting and constant upkeep. Hydrogen evaporates our planet's water. It is costly super costly to use. It is gained from fossil fuels, or electrolysis. Electrolysis needs increasing energy, and many more products in its cycle. Each product need increasing resources and manufacture. Any hydrogen fuel cells deplete like your phone battery, after so many uses often within a year. Needing continued service for the planet's most expensive fuel. Hydrogen isn't found naturally. It isn't in our atmosphere. It is the lightest gas. So light it escapes the planet floating into space. It is highly flammable, more flammable than natural gas which can produce it, like burning coal produces it. As it comes from burning carbon, or it is in water and can be separated through electrolysis. Electrolysis is often more expensive than getting it from fossil fuels. Biofuel is more polluting than coal. It is woodchips or ethanol, both are more polluting than diesel and coal. Woodchips are coated in resin, many are green bark, and recycled wood from every source, varnish, scrap, etc. Ethanol has grown plants then deforested them to turn them into fuel. Ethanol is thicker than diesel and emits 3 times as much. Rather than simply extracting diesel, and using it. However food waste instead of it composting is turned into another product, costing even more. Almost every renewable is affected by the weather and simply will not work in it. Whether it is solar panels or turbines.

There is absolutely nothing green in renewables. They think if they tell children fables about how our energy comes from the sun and wind it makes it green. They outright lie to them. No our energy doesn't come from the sun and wind. It comes from products. How are these products made. What lifetime do they have. What do they cost. How are they recycled. You will find with renewables it is a big huge ponzi scam.

They rob Peter to pay Paul. Lessen this here using far more there. While simply costing you far more. A big disgusting joke, paying the next energy czar. Except this time he wants to fully control everything you do.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are right about nuclear. Fusion reactors are still experimental and cost far too much to power. The super heated plasma wear electromagnets down after a few attemps. Rare earth parts. But the energy they need to turn on and then to harness the plasma for just over a minute isn't viable yet as an energy source. It is expunging energy quicker than it's producing. There is no stable field keeping it harnessed indefinitely to draw on any energy.

Green is the absolute opposite of green. Nothing but mindless stupidity has produced products like solar panels needing far more production to draw on any energy from, they work in space not on Earth full of natural fuel. They have no lifetime, impossible to repair yourself, a piece of shit throwaway, made to break to cost more on the next battery and service, and fitting. Inflation. They still need other power sources of fossil fuels to manufacture, glass and plastic casings, and to also use as a backup when there is no sun. Solar panels aren't recyclable. They are full of lead and acid and plastic. So they bury them rather than attempt recycling. Billions of tonnes of their waste litter our planet already from their bullshit ponzi. A ponzi that has been here for a blink, and is devastating. Solar also needs batteries, the most emitting industry, on this planet, outside of concrete. Turbines are as environmentally impacting. They are made out of fossil fuels. They also need fossil fuels to install, big trucks and ships with huge cranes, running on fuel. The blades of turbines don't recycle they are made out of carbon fibre, it isn't recycleable. Turbines need fossil fuel backup when there is no wind. If they are put on land it needs deforesting to get the wind. In the ocean it needs tonnes of concrete and boring into the seabed to place. They are more expensive than nuclear to use. Example, a turbine farm costs 6 billion to fit into the sea. Sonetimes less. But this was the latest and it is a huge farm. It powers a few hundred thousand homes under a million, sometimes more, if it has stormsurge making peak energy, rarely. If it does the turbines need new blades, breaking yearly. Nuclear power plant powers a few million homes costing 10-20 billion. Both need heaps of maintenance. But the turbine degrades far quicker with a lifespan of just over 20 years and the blades break much quicker needing refitting and constant upkeep. Hydrogen evaporates our planet's water. It is costly super costly to use. It is gained from fossil fuels, or electrolysis. Electrolysis needs increasing energy, and many more products in its cycle. Each product need increasing resources and manufacture. Any hydrogen fuel cells deplete like your phone battery, after so many uses often within a year. Needing continued service for the planet's most expensive fuel. Hydrogen isn't found naturally. It isn't in our atmosphere. It is the lightest gas. So light it escapes the planet floating into space. It is highly flammable, more flammable than natural gas which can produce it, like burning coal produces it. As it comes from burning carbon, or it is in water and can be separated through electrolysis. Electrolysis is often more expensive than getting it from fossil fuels. Biofuel is more polluting than coal. It is woodchips or ethanol, both are more polluting than diesel and coal. Woodchips are coated in resin, many are green bark, and recycled wood from every source, varnish, scrap, etc. Ethanol has grown plants then deforested them to turn them into fuel. Ethanol is thicker than diesel and emits 3 times as much. Rather than simply extracting diesel, and using it. However food waste instead of it composting is turned into another product, costing even more. Almost every renewable is affected by the weather and simply will not work in it. Whether it is solar panels or turbines.

There is absolutely nothing green in renewables. They think if they tell children fables about how our energy comes from the sun and wind it makes it green. They outright lie to them. No our energy doesn't come from the sun and wind. It comes from products. How are these products made. What lifetime do they have. What do they cost. How are they recycled. You will find with renewables it is a big huge ponzi scam.

They rob Peter to pay Paul. Lessen this here using far more there. While simply costing you far more. A big disgusting joke, paying the next energy czar. Except this time he wants to fully control everything you do.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are right about nuclear. Fusion reactors are still experimental and cost far too much to power. The super heated plasma wear electromagnets down after a few attemps. Rare earth parts. But the energy they need to turn on and then to harness the plasma for just over a minute isn't viable yet as an energy source. It is expunging energy quicker than it's producing. There is no stable field keeping it harnessed indefinitely to draw on any energy.

Green is the absolute opposite of green. Nothing but mindless stupidity has produced products like solar panels needing far more production to draw on any energy from, they work in space not on Earth full of natural fuel. They have no lifetime, impossible to repair yourself, a piece of shit throwaway, made to break to cost more on the next battery and service, and fitting. Inflation. They still need other power sources of fossil fuels to manufacture, glass and plastic casings, and to also use as a backup when there is no sun. Solar panels aren't recyclable. They are full of lead and acid and plastic. So they bury them rather than attempt recycling. Billions of tonnes of their waste litter our planet already from their bullshit ponzi. A ponzi that has been here for a blink, and is devastating. Solar also needs batteries, the most emitting industry, on this planet, outside of concrete. Turbines are as environmentally impacting. They are made out of fossil fuels. They also need fossil fuels to install, big trucks and ships with huge cranes, running on fuel. The blades of turbines don't recycle they are made out of carbon fibre, it isn't recycleable. Turbines need fossil fuel backup when there is no wind. If they are put on land it needs deforesting to get the wind. In the ocean it needs tonnes of concrete and boring into the seabed to place. They are more expensive than nuclear to use. Example, turbine farm costs 6 billion to fit into the sea. Sonetimes less. But this was the latest and it is huge. It powers a a few hundred thousand homes under a million, sometimes more, if it has stormsurge making peak energy, rarely. If it does the turbine needs new blades, breaking yearly. Nuclear power plant powers a few million homes costing 10-20 billion. Both need heaps of maintenance. But the turbine degrades far quicker with a lifespan of just over 20 years and the blades break much quicker needing refitting and constant upkeep. Hydrogen evaporates our planet's water. It is costly super costly to use. It is gained from fossil fuels, or electrolysis. Electrolysis needs increasing energy, and many more products in its cycle. Each product need increasing resources and manufacture. Any hydrogen fuel cells deplete like your phone battery, after so many uses often within a year. Needing continued service for the planet's most expensive fuel. Hydrogen isn't found naturally. It isn't in our atmosphere. It is the lightest gas. So light it escapes the planet floating into space. It is highly flammable, more flammable than natural gas which can produce it, like burning coal produces it. As it comes from burning carbon, or it is in water and can be separated through electrolysis. Electrolysis is often more expensive than getting it from fossil fuels. Biofuel is more polluting than coal. It is woodchips or ethanol, both are more polluting than diesel and coal. Woodchips are coated in resin, many are green bark, and recycled wood from every source, varnish, scrap, etc. Ethanol has grown plants then deforested them to turn them into fuel. Ethanol is thicker than diesel and emits 3 times as much. Rather than simply extracting diesel, and using it. However food waste instead of it composting is turned into another product, costing even more. Almost every renewable is affected by the weather and simply will not work in it. Whether it is solar panels or turbines.

There is absolutely nothing green in renewables. They think if they tell children fables about how our energy comes from the sun and wind it makes it green. They outright lie to them. No our energy doesn't come from the sun and wind. It comes from products. How are these products made. What lifetime do they have. What do they cost. How are they recycled. You will find with renewables it is a big huge ponzi scam.

They rob Peter to pay Paul. Lessen this here using far more there. While simply costing you far more. A big disgusting joke, paying the next energy czar. Except this time he wants to fully control everything you do.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are right about nuclear. Fusion reactors are still experimental and cost far too much to power. The super heated plasma wear electromagnets down after a few attemps. Rare earth parts. But the energy they need to turn on and then to harness the plasma for just over a minute isn't viable yet as an energy source. It is expunging energy quicker than it's producing. There is no stable field keeping it harnessed indefinitely to draw on any energy.

Green is the absolute opposite of green. Nothing but mindless stupidity has produced products like solar panels needing far more production to draw on any energy from, they work in space not on Earth full of natural fuel. They have no lifetime, impossible to repair yourself, a piece of shit throwaway, made to break to cost more on the next battery and service, and fitting. Inflation. They still need other power sources of fossil fuels to manufacture, glass and plastic casings, and to also use as a backup when there is no sun. Solar panels aren't recyclable. They are full of lead and acid and plastic. So they bury them rather than attempt recycling. Billions of tonnes of their waste litter our planet already from their bullshit ponzi. A ponzi that has been here for a blink, and is devastating. Solar also needs batteries, the most emitting industry, on this planet, outside of concrete. Turbines are as environmentally impacting. They are made out of fossil fuels. They also need fossil fuels to install, big trucks and ships with huge cranes, running on fuel. The blades of turbines don't recycle they are made out of carbon fibre, it isn't recycleable. Turbines need fossil fuel backup when there is no wind. If they are put on land it needs deforesting to get the wind. In the ocean it needs tonnes of concrete and boring into the seabed to place. They are more expensive than nuclear to use. Example turbine farm cost 6 billion to fit in the sea. It powers a a few hundred thousand homes under a million sometimes it has stormsurge making peak energy, rarely. If it does the turbines need new blades breaking yearly. Nuclear power plant powers a few million homes costing 12 billion. Both need heaps of maintenance. But the turbine degrades far quicker with a lifespan of just over 20 years. But the blades break much quicker needing refitting and constant upkeep. Hydrogen evaporates our planet's water. It is costly super costly to use. It is gained from fossil fuels, or electrolysis. Electrolysis needs increasing energy, and many more products in its cycle. Each product need increasing resources and manufacture. Any hydrogen fuel cells deplete like your phone battery, after so many uses often within a year. Needing continued service for the planet's most expensive fuel. Hydrogen isn't found naturally. It isn't in our atmosphere. It is the lightest gas. So light it escapes the planet floating into space. It is highly flammable, more flammable than natural gas which can produce it, like burning coal produces it. As it comes from burning carbon, or it is in water and can be separated through electrolysis. Electrolysis is often more expensive than getting it from fossil fuels. Biofuel is more polluting than coal. It is woodchips or ethanol, both are more polluting than diesel and coal. Woodchips are coated in resin, many are green bark, and recycled wood from every source, varnish, scrap, etc. Ethanol has grown plants then deforested them to turn them into fuel. Ethanol is thicker than diesel and emits 3 times as much. Rather than simply extracting diesel, and using it. However food waste instead of it composting is turned into another product, costing even more. Almost every renewable is affected by the weather and simply will not work in it. Whether it is solar panels or turbines.

There is absolutely nothing green in renewables. They think if they tell children fables about how our energy comes from the sun and wind it makes it green. They outright lie to them. No our energy doesn't come from the sun and wind. It comes from products. How are these products made. What lifetime do they have. What do they cost. How are they recycled. You will find with renewables it is a big huge ponzi scam.

They rob Peter to pay Paul. Lessen this here using far more there. While simply costing you far more. A big disgusting joke, paying the next energy czar. Except this time he wants to fully control everything you do.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are right about nuclear. Fusion reactors are still experimental and cost far too much to power. The super heated plasma wear electromagnets down after a few attemps. Rare earth parts. But the energy they need to turn on and then to harness the plasma for just over a minute isn't viable yet as an energy source. It is expunging energy quicker than it's producing. There is no stable field keeping it harnessed indefinitely to draw on any energy.

Green is the absolute opposite of green. Nothing but mindless stupidity has produced products like solar panels needing far more production to draw on any energy from, they work in space not on Earth full of natural fuel. They have no lifetime, impossible to repair yourself, a piece of shit throwaway, made to break to cost more on the next battery and service, and fitting. Inflation. They still need other power sources of fossil fuels to manufacture, glass and plastic casings, and to also use as a backup when there is no sun. Solar panels aren't recyclable. They are full of lead and acid and plastic. So they bury them rather than attempt recycling. Billions of tonnes of their waste litter our planet already from their bullshit ponzi. A ponzi that has been here for a blink, and is devastating. Solar also needs batteries, the most emitting industry, on this planet, outside of concrete. Turbines are as environmentally impacting. They are made out of fossil fuels. They also need fossil fuels to install, big trucks and ships with huge cranes, running on fuel. The blades of turbines don't recycle they are made out of carbon fibre, it isn't recycleable. Turbines need fossil fuel backup when there is no wind. If they are put on land it needs deforesting to get the wind. In the ocean it needs tonnes of concrete and boring into the seabed to place. They are more expensive than nuclear to use. Hydrogen evaporates our planet's water. It is costly super costly to use. It is gained from fossil fuels, or electrolysis. Electrolysis needs increasing energy, and many more products in its cycle. Each product need increasing resources and manufacture. Any hydrogen fuel cells deplete like your phone battery, after so many uses often within a year. Needing continued service for the planet's most expensive fuel. Hydrogen isn't found naturally. It isn't in our atmosphere. It is the lightest gas. So light it escapes the planet floating into space. It is highly flammable, more flammable than natural gas which can produce it, like burning coal produces it. As it comes from burning carbon, or it is in water and can be separated through electrolysis. Electrolysis is often more expensive than getting it from fossil fuels. Biofuel is more polluting than coal. It is woodchips or ethanol, both are more polluting than diesel and coal. Woodchips are coated in resin, many are green bark, and recycled wood from every source, varnish, scrap, etc. Ethanol has grown plants then deforested them to turn them into fuel. Ethanol is thicker than diesel and emits 3 times as much. Rather than simply extracting diesel, and using it. However food waste instead of it composting is turned into another product, costing even more. Almost every renewable is affected by the weather and simply will not work in it. Whether it is solar panels or turbines.

There is absolutely nothing green in renewables. They think if they tell children fables about how our energy comes from the sun and wind it makes it green. They outright lie to them. No our energy doesn't come from the sun and wind. It comes from products. How are these products made. What lifetime do they have. What do they cost. How are they recycled. You will find with renewables it is a big huge ponzi scam.

They rob Peter to pay Paul. Lessen this here using far more there. While simply costing you far more. A big disgusting joke, paying the next energy czar. Except this time he wants to fully control everything you do.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are right about nuclear. Fusion reactors are still experimental and cost far too much to power. The super heated plasma wear electromagnets down after a few attemps. Rare earth parts. But the energy they need to turn on and then to harness the plasma for just over a minute isn't viable yet as an energy source. It is expunging energy quicker than it's producing. There is no stable field keeping it harnessed indefinitely to draw on any energy.

Green is the absolute opposite of green. Nothing but mindless stupidity has produced products like solar panels needing far more production to draw on any energy from, they work in space not on Earth full of natural fuel. They have no lifetime, impossible to repair yourself, a piece of shit throwaway, made to break to cost more on the next battery and service, and fitting. Inflation. They still need other power sources of fossil fuels to manufacture, glass and plastic casings, and to also use as a backup when there is no sun. Solar panels aren't recyclable. They are full of lead and acid and plastic. So they bury them rather than attempt recycling. Billions of tonnes of their waste litter our planet already from their bullshit ponzi. A ponzi that has been here for a blink, and is devastating. Solar also needs batteries, the most emitting industry, on this planet, outside of concrete. Turbines are as environmentally impacting. They are made out of fossil fuels. They also need fossil fuels to install, big trucks and ships with huge cranes, running on fuel. The blades of turbines don't recycle they are made out of carbon fibre, it isn't recycleable. Turbines need fossil fuel backup when there is no wind. If they are put on land it needs deforesting to get the wind. In the ocean it needs tonnes of concrete and boring into the seabed to place. They are more expensive than nuclear to use. Hydrogen evaporates our planet's water. It is costly super costly to use. It is gained from fossil fuels, or electrolysis. Electrolysis needs increasing energy, and many more products in its cycle. Each product need increasing resources and manufacture. Any hydrogen fuel cells deplete like your phone battery, after so many uses often within a year. Needing continued service for the planet's most expensive fuel. Hydrogen isn't found naturally. It isn't in our atmosphere. It is the lightest gas. So light it escapes the planet floating into space. It is highly flammable, more flammable than natural gas which can produce it, like burning coal produces it. As it comes from burning carbon, or it is in water and can be separated through electrolysis. Electrolysis is often more expensive than getting it from fossil fuels. Biofuel is more polluting than coal. It is woodchips or ethanol, both are more polluting than diesel and coal. Woodchips are coated in resin, many are green bark, and recycled wood from every source, varnish, scrap, etc. Ethanol has grown plants then deforested them to turn them into fuel. Ethanol is thicker than diesel and emits 3 times as much. Rather than simply extracting diesel, and using it. However food waste instead of it composting is turned into another product, costing even more. Almost every renewable is affected by the weather and simply will not work in it. Whether it is solar panels or turbines.

There is absolutely nothing green in renewables. They think if they tell children fables about how our energy comes from the sun and wind it makes it green. They outright lie to them. No our energy doesn't come from the sun and wind. It comes from products. How are these products made. What lifetime do they have. What do they cost. How are they recycled. You will find with renewables it is a big huge ponzi scam.

They rob Peter to pay Paul. Lessen this here using far more there. While simply costing you far more. A big disgusting joke. Paying the next energy czar.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are right about nuclear. Fusion reactors are still experimental and cost far too much to power. The super heated plasma wear electromagnets down after a few attemps. Rare earth parts. But the energy they need to turn on and then to harness the plasma for just over a minute isn't viable yet as an energy source. It is expunging energy quicker than it's producing. There is no stable field keeping it harnessed indefinitely to draw on any energy.

Green is the absolute opposite of green. Nothing but mindless stupidity has produced products like solar panels needing far more production to draw on any energy from, they work in space not on Earth full of natural fuel. They have no lifetime, impossible to repair yourself, a piece of shit throwaway, made to break to cost more on the next battery and service, and fitting. Inflation. They still needs other power sources of fossil fuels to manufacture, glass and plastic casings, and to also use as a backup when there is no sun. Solar panels aren't recyclable. They are full of lead and acid and plastc. So they bury them rather than attempt recycling. Billions of tonnes of their waste litter the planet already from their bullshit ponzi. A ponzi that has been here for a blink, and is devastating. Solar also needs batteries, the most emitting industry, on this planet, outside of concrete. Turbines are as environmentally impacting. They are made out of fossil fuels. They need fossil fuels to install, big trucks and ships with huge cranes, running on fuel. The blades of turbines don't recycle they are made out of carbon fibre, it isn't recycleable. Turbines need fossil fuel backup when there is no wind. If they are put on land it needs deforesting to get the wind. In the ocean it needs tonnes of concrete and boring into the seabed to place. They are more expensive than nuclear to use. Hydrogen evaporates our planet's water. It is costly super costly to use. It is gained from fossil fuels, or electrolysis. Electrolysis needs increasing energy, and many more products in its cycle. Each product need increasing resources and manufacture. Any hydrogen fuel cells deplete like your phone battery, after so many uses often within a year. Needing continued service for the planet's most expensive fuel. Hydrogen isn't found naturally. It isn't in our atmosphere. It is the lightest gas. So light it escape the planet floating into space. It is highly flammable more flammable than natural gas which can produce it, like burning coal produces it. As it comes from burning carbon, or it is in water and can be separated through electrolysis. Electrolysis is often more expensive than getting it from fossil fuels. Biofuel is more polluting than coal. It is woodchips or ethanol, both are more polluting than diesel and coal. Woodchips are coated in resin, many are green bark, and recycled wood from every source, varnish, scrap, etc. Ethanol has grown plants then deforested them to turn them into fuel. Ethanol is thicker than diesel and emits 3 times as much. Rather than simply extracting diesel, and using it. However food waste instead of it composting, is turned into another product, costing even more. Almost every renewable is affected by the weather and simply will not work in it. Whether it is solar panels or turbines.

There is absolutely nothing green in renewables. They think if they tell children fables about how our energy comes from the sun and wind it makes it green. They outright lie to them. No our energy doesn't come from the sun and wind. It comes from products. How are these products made. What lifetime do they have. What do they cost. How are they recycled. You will find with renewables it is a big huge ponzi scam.

They rob Peter to pay Paul. Lessen this here using far more there. While simply costing you far more. A big disgusting joke. Paying the next energy czar.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: None provided.

You are right about nuclear. Fusion reactors are still experimental and cost far too much to power. The super heated plasma wear electromagnets down after a few attemps. Rare earth parts. But the energy they need to turn on and then to harness the plasma for just over a minute isn't viable yet as an energy source. It is expunging energy quicker than it's producing. There is no stable field keeping it harnessed indefinitely to draw on any energy.

Green is the absolute opposite of green. Nothing but mindless stupidity has produced products like solar panels needing far more production to draw on any energy from, they work in space not on Earth full of natural fuel. They have no lifetime, impossible to repair yourself, a piece of shit throwaway, made to break to cost more on the next battery and service, and fitting. Inflation. They still needs other power sources of fossil fuels to manufacture, glass and plastic casings, and to also use as a backup when there is no sun. Solar panels aren't recyclable. They are full of lead and acid and plastc. So they bury them rather than attempt recycling. Billions of tonnes of their waste litter the planet already from their bullshit ponzi. A ponzi that has been here for a blink, and is devastating. Solar also needs batteries, the most emitting industry, on this planet, outside of concrete. Turbines are as environmentally impacting. They are made out of fossil fuels. They need fossil fuels to install, big trucks and ships with huge cranes, running on fuel. The blades of turbines don't recycle they are made out of carbon fibre, it isn't recycleable. Turbines need fossil fuel backup when there is no wind. If they are put on land it needs deforesting to get the wind. In the ocean it needs tonnes of concrete and boring into the seabed to place. They are more expensive than nuclear to use. Hydrogen evaporates our planet's water. It is costly super costly to use. It is gained from fossil fuels, or electrolysis. Electrolysis needs increasing energy, and many more products in its cycle. Each product need increasing resources and manufacture. Any hydrogen fuel cells deplete like your phone battery, after so many uses often within a year. Needing continued service for the planet's most expensive fuel. Hydrogen isn't found naturally. It isn't in our atmosphere. It is the lightest gas. So light it escape the planet floating into space. It is highly flammable more flammable than natural gas which can produce it, like burning coal produces it. As it comes from burning carbon, or it is in water and can be separated through electrolysis. Electrolysis is often more expensive than getting it from fossil fuels. Biofuel is more polluting than coal. It is woodchips or ethanol, both are more polluting than diesel and coal. Woodchips are coated in resin, many are green bark, and recycled wood from every source, varnish, scrap, etc. Ethanol has grown plants then deforested them to turn them into fuel. Ethanol is thicker than diesel and emits 3 times as much. Rather than simply extracting diesel, and using it. However food waste instead of it composting, is turned into another product, costing even more. Almost every renewable is affected by the weather and simply will not work in it. Whether it is solar panels or turbines.

There is absolutely nothing green in renewables. They think if they tell children fables about how our energy comes from the sun and wind it makes it green. They outright lie to them. No our energy doesn't come from the sun and wind. It comes from products. How are these products made. What lifetime do they have. What do they cost. How are they recycled. You will find with renewables it is a big huge ponzi scam.

They rob Peter to pay Paul. Lessen this here use dark more there while simply costing you far more.

3 years ago
1 score
Reason: Original

You are right about nuclear. Fusion reactors are still experimental and cost far too much to power. The super heated plasma wear electromagnets down after a few attemps. Rare earth parts. But the energy they need to turn on and then to harness the plasma for just over a minute isn't viable yet as an energy source. It is expunging energy quicker than it's producing. There is no stable field keeping it harnessed indefinitely to draw on any energy.

Green is the absolute opposite of green. Nothing but mindless stupidity has produced products like solar panels needing far more production to draw on any energy from, they work in space nir on earth full of fuel. They have no lifetime, impossible to repair yourself, a piece of shit throwaway, made to break to cost more on the next battery and service and fitting, inflation. They still needs other power sources of fossil fuels to manufacture, glass and plastic casings, and to also use as a backup when there is no sun. Solar panels aren't recyclable. They are full of lead and acid and plastc. So they bury them rather then attempt recycling. Billions of tonnes of their waste litter the planet already from their bullshit ponzi. A ponzi that has been here for a blink, and is devastating. Solar also needs batteries, the most emitting industry, on this planet, outside of concrete. Turbines are as environmentally impacting. They are made out of fossil fuels. They need fossil fuels to install, big trucks and ships with huge cranes, running on fuel. The blades of turbines don't recycle they are made out of carbon fibre, it isn't recycleable. Turbines need fossil fuel backup when there is no wind. If they are put on land it needs deforesting to get the wind. In the ocean it needs tonnes of concrete and boring into the seabed to place. They are more expensive than nuclear to use. Hydrogen evaporates our planet's water. It is costly super costly to use. It is gained from fossil fuels, or electrolysis. Electrolysis needs increasing energy, and many more products in its cycle each products need increasing resources and manufacture. Any hydrogen fuel cells deplete like your phone battery after so many uses often within a year. Need continue service on the planet's most expensive fuel. Hydrogen isn't found naturally. It isn't in our atmosphere. It is the lightest gas. So light it escape the planet. It is highly flammable more flammable than natural gas which can produce it, like burning coal. As it comes from burning carbon, or it is in water and can be separated through electrolysis. It is often more expensive than getting it from fossil fuels. Biofuel is more polluting than coal. It is woodchips or ethanol both are more polluting than diesel and coal. Woodchips are coated in resin, many are green bark and recycled wood from every source varnish scrap. Ethanol has grown plants then deforested them to turn them into fuel. Ethanol is thicker than diesel and emits 3 times as much. Rather than simply extracting diesel, and using it. However food waste instead of it composting, is turned into another product, costing even more. Almost every renewable is affected by the weather and simply will not work in it. Whether it is solar panels or turbines.

There is absolutely nothing green in renewables. They think if they tell children fables about how our energy comes from the sun and wind it makes it green. They outright lie to them. No our energy doesn't come from the sun and wind. It comes from products. How are these products made. What lifetime do they have. What do they cost. How are they recycled. You will find with renewables it is a big huge ponzi scam.

They rob Peter to pay Paul. Lessen this here use dark more there while simply costing you far more.

3 years ago
1 score