The word nigger ain't racist. It is a word. It isn't hate speech. It is free speech. Racism is an action not your feelings. Where calling me racist is so hurtful. You dumb nigger.

What are you babbling about? Toxicology means whatever amounts are considered, affect the outcome. My example was alcoholics same with drug users being unable to drive from being breathalyser tested. There is no resistance to a reading stating their toxicology. This is variable per drunk, perhaps some can take more before a reading, but the limit set means there is a severe reaction impairing their ability. That fucking dumb argument by that drunk coroner, throws out the breathalyser, suggesting there is no toxicology because the drug user had a resistance to intake. Bullshit. He had a huge amount in his system potentially fatal. Like the drunk killed in a car crash. Being drunk killed them. They couldn't drive. How therefore should a cop treat the druggie? They would die of a heart attack anyway. Massive internal damage on their organs huge amounts in their system. Being on drugs killed the druggie, not the same restraint done on everybody else causing no death. Of course there might have been negligence but it wasn't manslaughter when the druggie drops dead regardless. Do I agree with the cops. Not the argument. I don't persay agree with the restraint used. But it has been used before drop dead druggie croaked. He resisted arrest and was a frothing crackhead. What can they do. Certainly not get done for manslaughter, it wasn't their intent. It wasn't even accidental. Because it hasn't happened prior in the restraint used, but perhaps that restraint has previously caused injury. Not the debate.The fault was from the druggie.

The word nigger ain't racist. It is a word. It isn't hate speech. It is free speech. Racism is an action not your feelings. Where calling me racist is so hurtful. You dumb nigger.

What are you babbling about? Toxicology means whatever amounts are considered, affect the outcome. My example was alcoholics same with drug users being unable to drive from being breathalyser tested. There is no resistance to a reading stating their toxicology. This is variable per drunk, perhaps some can take more before a reading, but the limit set means there is a severe reaction impairing their ability. That fucking dumb argument by that drunk coroner, throws out the breathalyser, suggesting there is no toxicology because the drug user had a resistance to intake. Bullshit. He had a huge amount in his system potentially fatal. Like the drunk killed in a car crash. Being drunk killed them. They couldn't drive. How therefore should a cop treat the druggie? They would die of a heart attack anyway. Massive internal damage on their organs huge amounts in their system. Being on drugs killed the druggie, not the same restraint done on everybody else causing no death. Of course there might have been negligence but it wasn't manslaughter when the druggie drops dead regardless. Do I agree with the cops. Not the argument. I don't persay agree with the restraint used. But it has been used before drop dead druggie croaked. He resisted arrest and was a frothing cracked. What can they do. Certainly not get done for manslaughter, it wasn't their intent. It wasn't even accidental. Because it hasn't happened prior in the restraint used, but perhaps that restraint has previously caused injury. Not the debate.The fault was from the druggie.

The word nigger ain't racist. It is a word. It isn't hate speech. It is free speech. Racism is an action not your feelings. Where calling me racist is so hurtful. You dumb nigger.

What are you babbling about? Toxicology means whatever amounts are considered, affect the outcome. My example was alcoholics same with drug users being unable to drive from being breathalyser tested. There is no resistance to a reading stating their toxicology. This is variable per drunk, perhaps some can take more before a reading, but the limit set means there is a severe reaction impairing their ability. That fucking dumb argument by that drunk coroner, throws out the breathalyser, suggesting there is no toxicology because the drug user had a resistance to intake. Bullshit. He had a huge amount in his system potentially fatal. Like the drunk killed in a car crash. Being drunk killed them. They couldn't drive. How therefore should a cop treat the druggie? They would die of a heart attack anyway. Massive internal damage on their organs huge amounts in their system. Being on drugs killed the druggie, not the same restraint done on everybody else causing no death. Of course there might have been negligence but it wasn't manslaughter when the druggie drops dead regardless. Do I agree with the cops. Not the argument. I don't persay agree with the restraint used. But it has been used before drop dead druggie croaked. He resisted arrest and was a frothing cracked. What can they do. Certainly not get done for manslaughter, it wasn't their intent. It was even accidental. Because it hasn't happened prior in the restraint used, but perhaps that restraint has previously caused injury. Not the debate.The fault was from the druggie.

The word nigger ain't racist. It is a word. It isn't hate speech. It is free speech. Racism is an action not your feelings. Where calling me racist is so hurtful. You dumb nigger.

What are you babbling about? Toxicology means whatever amounts are considered, affect the outcome. My example was alcoholics same with drug users being unable to drive from being breathalyser tested. There is no resistance to a reading stating their toxicology. This is variable per drunk, perhaps some can take more before a reading, but the limit set means there is a severe reaction impairing their ability. That fucking dumb argument by that drunk coroner, throws out the breathalyser, suggesting there is no toxicology because the drug user had a resistance to intake. Bullshit. He had a huge amount in his system potentially fatal. Like the drunk killed in a car crash. Being drunk killed them. They couldn't drive. How therefore should a cop treat the druggie? They would die of a heart attack anyway. Massive internal damage on their organs huge amounts in their system. Being on drugs killed the druggie, not the same restraint done on everybody else causing no death. Of course there might have been negligence but it wasn't manslaughter when the druggie drops dead regardless. Do I agree with the cops not the argument. I don't persay agree with the restraint used. But it has been used before drop dead druggie croaked. When he resulted arrest and was a frothing cracked what can they do. Certainly not get done for manslaughter it wasn't their intent. It was even accidental. Because it has happened prior in the restraint used which perhaps has previously caused injury. Not the debate.The fault was from the druggie.

The word nigger ain't racist. It is a word. It isn't hate speech. It is free speech. Racism is an action not your feelings. Where calling me racist is so hurtful. You dumb nigger.

What are you babbling about? Toxicology means whatever amounts are considered, affect the outcome. My example was alcoholics same with drug users being unable to drive from being breathalyser tested. There is no resistance to a reading stating their toxicology. This is variable per drunk, perhaps some can take more before a reading, but the limit set means there is a severe reaction impairing their ability. That fucking dumb argument by that drunk coroner, throws out the breathalyser, suggesting there is no toxicology because the drug user had a resistance to intake. Bullshit. He had a huge amount in his system potentially fatal. Like the drunk killed in a car crash. Being drunk killed them. They couldn't drive. How therefore should a cop treat the druggie? They would die of a heart attack anyway. Massive internal damage on their organs huge amounts in their system. Being on drugs killed the druggie, not the same restraint done on everybody else causing no death. Of course there might have been negligence but it wasn't manslaughter when the druggie drops dead regardless.