Yeah so convenient for their narrative, right? That's what I thought as well.

It also doesn't make much sense. The motive isn't truly there. It feels manufactured. Even the paragraphs mentioning how he was identified are sketch.

And frankly these articles that are getting written about this are focusing on creating a narrative that he was a good Christian boy with a pastor as a father and he went hunting and he was silent but then he did this, all the while being very thin on objective details. It is all drowned in subjective narrative.

It is disgusting what journalism has become.

Yeah so convenient for their narrative, right? That's what I thought as well.

It also doesn't make much sense. The motive isn't truly there. It feels manufactured. Even the paragraphs mentioning how he was identified are sketch.