It has to go through court before they force vaccination to be able to engage in otherwise daily activities, or before they employ vaccine passports.

At the moment emergency powers have rushed a vaccine through. In their power, emergency forcing demand. But as soon as rights are questioned the vaccine goes through court. Especially when a percentage of the population cannot take it at all, many refuse too. Further the vaccine is both fatal and causes injuries. It hasn't been subject to peer review, non bias court case, prior to any launch because of the emergency power authorized. However forcing vaccination on the public who both refuse and further implementing it to step on human rights with more regulations like passports, now becomes a court case or becomes law. Full scrutiny is sooner adopted outside of the rampant corruption assuming the greater good. Literally some have and continue to line their pockets without any other thought.

Aside it is being filed as lawsuits already from both the injuries and deaths caused.

Speculation still. As a lot of power has rigged the need facilitating its usage where it has had virtually no independent scrutiny. Here in this press he is speaking out of turn on writing law to push the vaccine. Why would a court overturn sentencing because of vaccination? The same applies to a vaccine passport or forced inoculation.

It has to go through court before they force vaccination to be able to engage in otherwise daily activities, or before they employ vaccine passports.

At the moment emergency powers have rushed a vaccine through. In their power, emergency forcing demand. But as soon as rights are questioned the vaccine goes through court. Especially when a percentage of the population cannot take it at all, many refuse too. Further the vaccine is both fatal and causes injuries. It hasn't been subject to peer review, non bias court case, prior to any launch because of the emergency power authorized. However forcing vaccination on the public who both refuse and further implementing it to step on human rights with more regulations like passports, now becomes a court case or becomes law. Full scrutiny is sooner adopted outside of the rampant corruption assuming the greater good. Literally some have and continue to line their pockets without any other thought.

Aside it is being filed as lawsuits already from both the injuries and deaths caused.

Speculation still. As a lot of power has rigged the need facilitating its usage where it has had virtually no independent scrutiny. Here in this press he is speaking out of turn on writing law uo push the vaccine. Why would a court overturn sentencing because of vaccination? The same applies to a vaccine passport or forced inoculation.

It has to go through court before they force vaccination to be able to engage in otherwise daily activities, or before they employ vaccine passports.

At the moment emergency powers have rushed a vaccine through. In their power, emergency forcing demand. But as soon as rights are questioned the vaccine goes through court. Especially when a percentage of the population cannot take it at all, many refuse too. Further the vaccine is both fatal and causes injuries. It hasn't been subject to peer review, non bias court case, prior to any launch because of the emergency power authorized. However forcing vaccination on the public who both refuse and further implementing it to step on human rights with more regulations like passports, now becomes a court case or becomes a. Full scrutiny is sooner adopted outside of rampant corruption assuming the greater good.

Aside it is being filed as lawsuits already from both the injuries and deaths caused.