Let's first find common ground; what do you think about David Cole's modern assessments as per an interview with The Guardian: How is this a "modern assessment" if the guy changed his name multiple times because the zionist cadre tried to murder him for exposing their fraud? And it contradicts itself saying "yes genocidal program" to "no, they just needed cheap labor" Is there a video of this which proves it's him? I don't believe he said any of that. Even if he did it doesn't change the fact his video full of hard science completely destroyed the narrative.

do you believe Poland was fully the aggressor I believe the claims of the Germans responding to "aggression" on the border are more than plausible given communist infiltration. They had third party swiss doctors come in to investigate. Contrast that with the bolsheviks and the crude holes in their air raid shelter. I mean, we can find people "calling" WW2 and it's just centuries long tensions between old kingdoms. I'll try to edit with quotes of it "being set off in the balkans". "Otto Von Bismarck predicted the start of World war I with quote “One day the great European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans (1888).” If we can point the finger at any one people, it's the bolsheviks. What part do you believe Germany had in the war? The only crime of germany was that of being successful. http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm What's more; what do you think about the German actions up until that point? Did they violate the Treaty of Versailles Versailles was no "treaty". They slapped Germany down for the crime of being successful. In WW1 they won. England was going to surrender when America got involved. Who got America involved? The bolsheviks for palestine. The speech by Mr Freeman I sourced above this is enlightening. This is the "first hand knowledge" which I value. Did they initiate a forcefully backed annexation of Austria and swaths of Czechoslovakia? I don't know off hand and I won't pretend to know every detail of the wars by memory. I also don't give a shit about every tiny european country. Germany saw communism which is really jewish bolshevism taking europe and sacrificed itself to save the rest of us. They broke the molotov ribbentrop pact because they knew the shiesty jews were waiting to sweep the continent. what do you think about the modern narrative about the Molotov Ribbentrop pact, What is the modern narrative? That it was a ploy? I don't know exactly what you mean but I can tell you Hitler was disgusted by the jews and was himself jewish. what is your take on Pearl Harbor? Was japan starving at that point? If I remember they were pretty desperate. I don't know where youre going with any of these questions. What do you think about the narrative of the German declaration of war against the United States? I have no idea what you're talking about. If I had to guess I would say it was more political show at the tail end of the war than anything. And the United States never declared war on "the Nazi party" it was Germany. you should accept my attempts to counter-argue, Ok, do it. IMO open mindedness doesn't just mean accepting whatever anyone says; it means debate or argument with those you disagree with That's not what's you've demonstrated with your argument of "I have family, therefore the shoah definitely happened". That's not an argument.

Let's first find common ground; what do you think about David Cole's modern assessments as per an interview with The Guardian: How is this a "modern assessment" if the guy changed his name multiple times because the zionist cadre tried to murder him for exposing their fraud? And it contradicts itself saying "yes genocidal program" to "no, they just needed cheap labor" Is there a video of this which proves it's him? I don't believe he said any of that. Even if he did it doesn't change the fact his video full of hard science completely destroyed the narrative. do you believe Poland was fully the aggressor I believe the claims of the Germans responding to "aggression" on the border are more than plausible given communist infiltration. They had third party swiss doctors come in to investigate. Contrast that with the bolsheviks and the crude holes in their air raid shelter. I mean, we can find people "calling" WW2 and it's just centuries long tensions between old kingdoms. I'll try to edit with quotes of it "being set off in the balkans". "Otto Von Bismarck predicted the start of World war I with quote “One day the great European War will come out of some damned foolish thing in the Balkans (1888).” If we can point the finger at any one people, it's the bolsheviks. What part do you believe Germany had in the war? The only crime of germany was that of being successful. http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm What's more; what do you think about the German actions up until that point? Did they violate the Treaty of Versailles Versailles was no "treaty". They slapped Germany down for the crime of being successful. In WW1 they won. England was going to surrender when America got involved. Who got America involved? The bolsheviks for palestine. The speech by Mr Freeman I sourced above this is enlightening. This is the "first hand knowledge" which I value. Did they initiate a forcefully backed annexation of Austria and swaths of Czechoslovakia? I don't know off hand and I won't pretend to know every detail of the wars by memory. I also don't give a shit about every tiny european country. Germany saw communism which is really jewish bolshevism taking europe and sacrificed itself to save the rest of us. They broke the molotov ribbentrop pact because they knew the shiesty jews were waiting to sweep the continent. what do you think about the modern narrative about the Molotov Ribbentrop pact, What is the modern narrative? That it was a ploy? I don't know exactly what you mean but I can tell you Hitler was disgusted by the jews and was himself jewish. what is your take on Pearl Harbor? Was japan starving at that point? If I remember they were pretty desperate. I don't know where youre going with any of these questions. What do you think about the narrative of the German declaration of war against the United States? I have no idea what you're talking about. If I had to guess I would say it was more political show at the tail end of the war than anything. And the United States never declared war on "the Nazi party" it was Germany. you should accept my attempts to counter-argue, Ok, do it. IMO open mindedness doesn't just mean accepting whatever anyone says; it means debate or argument with those you disagree with That's not what's you've demonstrated with your argument of "I have family, therefore the shoah definitely happened". That's not an argument.

Let's first find common ground; what do you think about David Cole's modern assessments as per an interview with The Guardian:

How is this a "modern assessment" if the guy changed his name multiple times because the zionist cadre tried to murder him for exposing their fraud? And it contradicts itself saying "yes genocidal program" to "no, they just needed cheap labor"

Is there a video of this which proves it's him? I don't believe he said any of that. Even if he did it doesn't change the fact his video full of hard science completely destroyed the narrative.

do you believe Poland was fully the aggressor

I believe the claims of the Germans responding to "aggression" on the border are more than plausible given communist infiltration. They had third party swiss doctors come in to investigate. Contrast that with the bolsheviks and the crude holes in their air raid shelter.

I mean, we can find people "calling" WW2 and it's just centuries long tensions between old kingdoms. I'll try to edit with quotes of it "being set off in the balkans".

If we can point the finger at any one people, it's the bolsheviks.

What part do you believe Germany had in the war?

The only crime of germany was that of being successful.

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

What's more; what do you think about the German actions up until that point? Did they violate the Treaty of Versailles

Versailles was no "treaty". They slapped Germany down for the crime of being successful. In WW1 they won. England was going to surrender when America got involved. Who got America involved? The bolsheviks for palestine. The speech by Mr Freeman I sourced above this is enlightening. This is the "first hand knowledge" which I value.

Did they initiate a forcefully backed annexation of Austria and swaths of Czechoslovakia?

I don't know off hand and I won't pretend to know every detail of the wars by memory. I also don't give a shit about every tiny european country. Germany saw communism which is really jewish bolshevism taking europe and sacrificed itself to save the rest of us. They broke the molotov ribbentrop pact because they knew the shiesty jews were waiting to sweep the continent.

what do you think about the modern narrative about the Molotov Ribbentrop pact,

What is the modern narrative? That it was a ploy? I don't know exactly what you mean but I can tell you Hitler was disgusted by the jews and was himself jewish.

what is your take on Pearl Harbor?

Was japan starving at that point? If I remember they were pretty desperate. I don't know where youre going with any of these questions.

What do you think about the narrative of the German declaration of war against the United States?

I have no idea what you're talking about. If I had to guess I would say it was more political show at the tail end of the war than anything. And the United States never declared war on "the Nazi party" it was Germany.

you should accept my attempts to counter-argue,

Ok, do it.

IMO open mindedness doesn't just mean accepting whatever anyone says; it means debate or argument with those you disagree with

That's not what's you've demonstrated with your argument of "I have family, therefore the shoah definitely happened". That's not an argument.