Why would the GOP want to do something about the tech censorship? If I haven't missed something obvious, those so called big tech platforms haven't tried to shut down the voices from the GOP or the RINO.

Those platforms have only been censoring the US nationalism voices, pro trump sentiments, or anything that remotely supports either of them.

The GOP, or even Progressive Democrats for that matter, has been pursuing everything the globalism has presented, while cynically berating the US nationalism and calling it an isolationism or an alt-right ideology.

And

unlike what Tim Pool and the panel seem to believe (or just pretend to believe), the big tech companies do not decide what they would censor. Let me rephrase it: Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, or Susan Wojcicki doesn't have a complete authority on their own platforms. They didn't gather around and decide together to kill the Hunter Biden laptop story. Someone told them to.

The big interest groups, be it the major political cliques or international banking cartels, are the ones who are pulling the strings behind the curtain when it deems necessary. And that's why you don't see the GOP or the Democrats are doing something worth when it comes to the censorship by Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube.

Why would the GOP want to do something about the tech censorship? If I haven't missed something obvious, those so called big tech platforms haven't tried to shut down the voices from the GOP or the RINO.

Those platforms have only been censoring the US nationalism voices, pro trump sentiments, or anything that remotely supports either of them.

The GOP, or even Progressive Democrats for that matter, has been pursuing everything the globalism has presented, while cynically berating the US nationalism and calling it an isolationism or an alt-right ideology.

And

unlike what Tim Pool and the panel seem to believe (or just pretend to believe), the big tech companies do not decide what they would censor. Let me rephrase it: Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, or Susan Wojcicki doesn't have a complete authority on their own platforms. They didn't gather around and decided together to kill the Hunter Biden laptop story. Someone told them to.

The big interest groups, be it the major political cliques or international banking cartels, are the ones who are pulling the strings behind the curtain when it deems necessary. And that's why you don't see the GOP or the Democrats are doing something worth when it comes to the censorship by Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube.

Why would the GOP want to do something about the tech censorship? If I haven't missed something obvious, those so called big tech platforms haven't tried to shut down the voices from the GOP or even the RINO.

Those platforms have only been censoring the US nationalism voices, pro trump sentiments, or anything that remotely supports either of them.

The GOP, or even Progressive Democrats for that matter, has been pursuing everything the globalism has presented, while cynically berating the US nationalism and calling it an isolationism or an alt-right ideology.

And

unlike what Tim Pool and the panel seem to believe (or just pretend to believe), the big tech companies do not decide what they would censor. Let me rephrase it: Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, or Susan Wojcicki doesn't have a complete authority on their own platforms. They didn't gather around and decided together to kill the Hunter Biden laptop story. Someone told them to.

The big interest groups, be it the major political cliques or international banking cartels, are the ones who are pulling the strings behind the curtain when it deems necessary. And that's why you don't see the GOP or the Democrats are doing something worth when it comes to the censorship by Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube.

Why does the GOP want to do something about the tech censorship? If I haven't missed something obvious, those so called big tech platforms haven't tried to shut down the voices from the GOP or even the RINO.

Those platforms have only been censoring the US nationalism voices, pro trump sentiments, or anything that remotely supports either of them.

The GOP, or even Progressive Democrats for that matter, has been pursuing everything the globalism has presented, while cynically berating the US nationalism and calling it an isolationism or an alt-right ideology.

And

unlike what Tim Pool and the panel seem to believe (or just pretend to believe), the big tech companies do not decide what they would censor. Let me rephrase it: Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, or Susan Wojcicki doesn't have a complete authority on their own platforms. They didn't gather around and decided together to kill the Hunter Biden laptop story. Someone told them to.

The big interest groups, be it the major political cliques or international banking cartels, are the ones who are pulling the strings behind the curtain when it deems necessary. And that's why you don't see the GOP or the Democrats are doing something worth when it comes to the censorship by Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube.

Why does the GOP want to do something about the tech censorship? If I haven't missed something obvious, those so called big tech platforms haven't tried to shut down the voices from the GOP or even the RINO.

Those platforms have only been censoring the US nationalism voices, pro trump sentiments, or anything that remotely supports either of them.

The GOP, or even Progressive Democrats for that matter, has been pursuing everything the globalism has presented, while cynically berating the US nationalism and calling it an isolationism or an alt-right ideology.

And

unlike what Tim Pool and the panel seem to believe (or just pretend to believe), the big tech companies do not decide what they would censor. Let me rephrase it: Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, or Susan Wojcicki doesn't have a complete authority on their own platforms. They didn't gather around and decided together to kill the Hunter Biden laptop story on those social media platforms. Someone told them to.

The big interest groups, be it the major political cliques or international banking cartels, are the ones who are pulling the strings behind the curtain when it deems necessary. And that's why you don't see the GOP or the Democrats are doing something worth when it comes to the censorship by Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube.

Why does the GOP want to do something about the tech censorship? If I haven't missed something obvious, those so called big tech platforms haven't tried to shut down the voices from the GOP or even the RINO.

Those platforms have only been censoring the US nationalism voices, pro trump sentiments, or anything that remotely supports either of them.

The GOP, or even Progressive Democrats for that matter, has been pursuing everything the globalism has presented, while cynically berating the US nationalism and calling it an isolationism or an alt-right ideology.

And

unlike what Tim Pool and the panel seem to believe (or just pretend to believe), the big tech companies do not decide what they would censor. Let me rephrase it: Mark Zuckerberg, Jack Dorsey, or Susan Wojcicki doesn't have a complete authority on their own platforms. They didn't gather around and decided together to kill the Hunter Biden laptop story on the platforms. Someone told them to.

The big interest groups, be it the major political cliques or international banking cartels, are the ones who are pulling the strings behind the curtain when it deems necessary. And that's why you don't see the GOP or the Democrats are doing something worth when it comes to the censorship by Facebook, Twitter, or YouTube.