Zero. The fact that you are asking this question is basically an admission that I am right, because otherwise you would be refuting me.

It is worth noting that while you are trying to troll me for having the same opinion about Neil and the rest of "The Science" regarding the mechanics of jumping on airplanes and the spin of the earth, you have the same opinion as them regarding the equivalence of these two positions. When they were pushing the jab, anyone who refused their "safe and effective vaccine" was essentially treated as someone who denied the round rotating globe.

So you and Neil actually agree that belief in the spinning ball and belief in the safe and effective vaccine are the same*. Those of us who are smart understand that these are two unrelated items that should be evaluated independently. It turns out that the claims about the jab's safety and effectiveness were totally absurd, and also, the claims about the failure of the spinning globe model are totally absurd.

*If you want to know why I always answer these things, it is because in my opinion the purpose of this whole psyop is to do exactly this. That is, bring the "conspiracy crowd" over to flat earth or other non traditional cosmologies. Then, you can use this as an "argument by association" on other things, like, say, the jab.