Today in retardville.......
(planetarysunshade.org)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
These terrorists need to be killed before they wipe out all life on Earth.
Don't worry, it's fake anyway
Idk, the artimis update yesterday was full core sheeptarded
Yes, I'm an ex glober. Because it's obvious. Flying jets and dumping toxins on us is already there. And climate change is the excuse they will use to dump even weirder shit on us...so, I guess what I'm saying is that this is fake and it's only a piece of the propaganda they will use to convince us they are spreading toxins that will harm us, which they will do one way or another anyway. Relax, we have always been fuct.
Instead of looking for someone to convince u have u tried researching?
Add in some critical thought and u may get it one day.
Clearly u didnt understand any of the examples of the helicopter question i had for u and your answers were long winded over complicated. None grounded in common sense or critical thought. Spewing nonsense that just doesn't fly.
Im not rehashing all that again to no avail such as your weak response to the pear shape planet your buddy N.D.T states. 😅
You can talk with me. I'm not a FLat earther. Like Jesus faggy shit, no flat earth community. I just use basic observations and math to determine without a doubt that the theory that we are actually on a globe and moving is impossible.
It takes weeks to unlearn and relearn. I can help, but there is no way I will waste my time with trying to convince someone who doesn't want to be open.
The map of the earth is best measured by the Gleason map. Though, of course, the mainstream would not support that. Australia looks wider than we are used to seeing. I drove across it back when I was still a glober, I remember it feeling much longer than we expected and now I wish I had measured my kms to the stated kms on the maps. Anyway, I digress.
It's easier to approach the problem of FE if you take logic and scienctific method seriously. Meaning, the theory is that we are on a globe. It's not the known. Don't try to prove it's flat, prove it can't be moving, or prove it cannot be a globe by trying to measure curvature. You can also do a proof if you have a friend that lives a long ways away from you. And you both measure observed angles to the sun (or star, or moon) and use trig to figure out that the earth could not be a globe. There are hundreds of ways to see how obvious it is, once you know what you're looking it (tides, sonar, the time of daylight in winter and summer, reflections of moon on the ocean, just using binoculars to see distant buildings or boats, then there are experiments like Airey's failure, back in the early 1900s the debates of FE in the science community were palatable, nobody thought the earth was a globe except the power backed institutions that eventually won. What people believe is good as the truth....but again, first have to unlearn
The shit they put in the air will be for something other than blocking the sun, that is just the excuse they will use. And ya, it probably will make it darker, but the real reason won't ever be know to the test subjects.
Well, that's gonna be a lot of typing. Can't answer everything, plus, it's hard to explain without visual aids. I started by watching videos until I could grasp the concepts and do it myself. Yes, looking for the curve, super easy to see, but difficult to understand what you're seeing because of the programming, we have a hard time accepting what we see. If you look across a large body of water, and you know the distance between you and some buildings on the other side. Then you can calculate how much curve there should be, and then you use binoculars or zoom camera to see the bottom of buildings that should not be possible. Refraction is the excuse people use, but that doesn't explain how you can see a perfect clarity of objects that are supposedly behind a curve and don't have direct line of sight
So, using trig. You can observe the sun or moon. You and friend. The concept is best visualized when you're several times zone apart.
You have to know how far apart you are. The base. And each of you take a measurement of the angle of the moon from your horizon.
What you will find is that you can use those angles and the known distance to approx the elevation (height) of the moon. It works. But if you assume there is a curvature, then the angles don't make sense because it would mean there are two moons, the single object could not convervge with the angles you observe. Really hard to explain on text.
As for tides. So, there are 4 tides per day. But not everywhere. If the moon was causing tides, then we would have two tides every day. Think about it. Also, tides would be everywhere, but there are tidal nodes all over the world.... places where the ocean doesn't change tides. The globe tards struggle and jump through whatever hoops they need in order to keep their beliefs alive, but when you look at a tidal nodes map, you can see there are just too many places that are not affected by tides. The moon and gravity supposed to be consistent, so why some places not affected?
Gravity is not a force and doesn't exist. It's just magnetism and boyanct forces at play. Gravity isn't needed for any physics calculation, because you can just use acceleration. Gravity is actually just an observation of an average rate that things fall. It's a man made concept that hides the actual forces at play.
I don't know how this is gonna work. I'm not trying to convince you. I can answer questions, sure, but you have to have some momentum of figuring it out yourself first