Its easy when it comes to buoyancy and density. Anything heavier than air will sink and lighter than air will rise such as a helium balloon or smoke. No magical gravity that works on some things but not others...simple as...and remember its still considered the THEORY of gravity.
The plane traveling against the spin of the planet surely should take longer than the plane traveling with the spin..?
Its easy when it comes to buoyancy and density. Anything heavier than air will sink and lighter than air will rise such as a helium balloon or smoke. No magical gravity that works on some things but not others...simple as...and remember its still considered the THEORY of gravity.
The plane traveling against the spin of the planet surely should take longer than the plane traveling with the spin..?
Does this not make logical sense?
Density doesn't take any mental gymnastics to make sense opposed to the THEORY of gravity.
No one mentioned a train but a plane...
It makes zero sense that both travel times are the same on a surface that is supposedly spinning. 66,000 mph to boot lol...nice touch.
To say the plane is locked to the earth's spin is absolute nonsense in my mind.
The earth isn't moving, the ground isn't curving and its flat as the eyes can see and more. Tons of evidence and experiments support this.
Again, I'll trust my senses over liars any day