If you want a man in charge, I'm your man. If you want a woman in charge, you can keep the one you got. If you want u/Buttoucha9k to be mod, vote for him.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Your friend SwampRangers said that anyone could make a post making a bid for mod and having the community vote. That's why I posted that. Not to disrupt the community, but to help ensure the mod position is representative of what the community wants. It appears to have already been disrupted by admin interjection and you banning your critics.
For the sake of community input, will you please make a post where the community can vote between you, me, and Buttoucha9k for mod and keep it up for a week to ensure ample vote time, and pledge to honor the results with whoever wins and make them mod (or kept it if you win)? And unban all the members of the community that you banned for being critical of you so it can be an actual community input, and not just those who support you or stay silent?
Even those who you don't like are a part of the community. Banning your critics and keeping those who remain silent or support you isn't true community support. That's manufactured support. I want to ensure the members of this community have true input in it.
I've been banning those intent on disrupting. There are plenty of people I disagree with that are not banned.
You have your post and it's open.
Are you agreeing to accept this post as a vote for mod that you'll adhere to the results of?
If so, please say so clearly and sticky the post so everyone can easily see it over the course of a week so it doesn't get buried and not seen by members of the community.
I want a forum driven by organic community input.
Well the votes don't count and users can contribute if they wish. I'm not going to sticky it because I don't think you are here in good faith. You have no standing in this community but now 'want' it for 'some reason'. Good luck
I find it deceptive when you told me "You have your post and it's open" in response to me saying "For the sake of community input, will you please make a post where the community can vote between you, me, and Buttoucha9k for mod and keep it up for a week to ensure ample vote time, and pledge to honor the results with whoever wins and make them mod (or kept it if you win)?".
It feels like you said what you did to try to get me to think the votes would count, and there could potentially be a change in who the mod is. When I asked for a formal commitment to the vote from you, you backtracked and said "Well the votes don't count". So my post is pointless then...why did you lead me on like that?
That feels deceptive and suspicious on your part. Why are you afraid of a community consensus vote for who the mod is if you believe you have the will of the community behind you? I'm asking that this community has community consensus about who the mod is, and that the will of the community be respected and followed. Even if that means you remain mod if you win.
Can you please put aside your personal feelings of disdain towards me and objectively deal with what I am proposing? The way you immediately escalated to accusing me of being a terrorist without any objective reasons for your claims seriously calls your judgment calls into question about those you have deemed intent on disrupting and banned. I doubt you had any objective standard for deeming someone here in bad faith or intent on disrupting, and your only standard is your personal feelings you call your sixth sense.
You don't seem to have community support, and the way you've interacted with me here. People seeing that are likely to start disengaging and going elsewhere where there's order and some kind of objectivity, and not your emotional whims of the day running the place.